History
  • No items yet
midpage
844 N.W.2d 363
S.D.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Flowers sought a certificate of probable cause under SDCL 21-27-18.1 more than 30 days after the circuit court denied habeas relief.
  • The circuit court granted the certificate despite untimeliness, certifying an issue for appeal.
  • Flowers filed a timely notice of appeal to the South Dakota Supreme Court after the circuit court’s certification.
  • SDCL 21-27-18.1 requires a certificate of probable cause within 30 days from the date the final order is entered, making the motion jurisdictional.
  • The circuit court’s final order denying habeas relief was entered May 7, 2013; Flowers’ certificate motion was filed June 10, 2013.
  • This Court dismissed Flowers’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to the untimely filing of the certificate request.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the certificate of probable cause was timely filed Flowers contends the motion was timely under SDCL 21-27-18.1. State asserts the motion was filed beyond 30 days from entry, depriving jurisdiction. Untimely filing deprived circuit court of jurisdiction; appeal dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Christensen v. Weber, 740 N.W.2d 622 (S.D. 2007) (deadline runs from entry; statute is jurisdictional)
  • Hannon v. Weber, 638 N.W.2d 48 (S.D. 2001) (no notice of entry requirement for SDCL 21-27-18.1)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Flowers v. Weber
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 6, 2014
Citations: 844 N.W.2d 363; 2014 WL 895191; 2014 SD 12; 26769
Docket Number: 26769
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
Log In