History
  • No items yet
midpage
156 So. 3d 805
Miss.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Flowers was convicted of murder for fatally shooting Charles Wash and challenged the verdict as against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
  • Wash was killed on April 7, 2008, in a Newton County area; scene involved a truck and multiple shell asks; Hilton identified Flowers by voice at trial.
  • Hilton testified to the shooting and later admitted involvement in planning the killing; his credibility was a central issue.
  • Physical evidence included a white sock, an Air Jordan shoe, and a white tank-top shirt; Flowers’ DNA was the majority contributor on the shirt.
  • Flowers’ cell phone was recovered at the scene; conflicting statements about Flowers’ whereabouts the night of the shooting existed.
  • Defense discredited Hilton and presented an alibi; jury found Flowers guilty; post-trial motion for new trial was denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the denial of the new-trial motion was proper Flowers argues the evidence conflicts justify a new trial State contends credibility issues and conflicts fall within jury’s weighing, not grounds for new trial Affirmed; verdict supported by weight of evidence; no basis for new trial

Key Cases Cited

  • Jenkins v. State, 947 So.2d 270 (Miss. 2006) (affirmed murder conviction based on corroborating and DNA evidence)
  • Ross v. State, 954 So.2d 968 (Miss. 2007) (precludes intrusion into jury credibility determinations; weigh credibility remains jury's province)
  • Weatherspoon v. State, 56 So.3d 559 (Miss.2011) (evidence conflicts and witness credibility generally for jury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Flowers v. State
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 24, 2013
Citations: 156 So. 3d 805; 2013 WL 264583; 2013 Miss. LEXIS 18; No. 2011-KA-01031-SCT
Docket Number: No. 2011-KA-01031-SCT
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
Log In
    Flowers v. State, 156 So. 3d 805