Florida Agency for Health Care Administration v. Bayou Shores SNF, LLC (In re Bayou Shores SNF, LLC)
533 B.R. 337
M.D. Fla.2015Background
- Bayou Shores SNF, LLC operates a skilled nursing facility that relied on Medicare and Medicaid for over 90% of revenue and whose patients required specialized psychiatric care.
- Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) surveys in 2014 found substantial deficiencies; CMS notified the Debtor that its Medicare provider agreement would be terminated and payments would end shortly thereafter.
- Debtor sued in federal district court and obtained a TRO enjoining termination; the district court dissolved the TRO and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) because administrative remedies were unexhausted.
- Within an hour of that dismissal, the Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition and sought emergency relief in bankruptcy court to enjoin termination of its Medicare/Medicaid provider agreements as property of the estate.
- The Bankruptcy Court entered a provisional injunction (Sept. 5, 2014) preventing termination and later issued a Confirmation Order authorizing assumption of the provider agreements; AHCA and the Secretary appealed.
- The district court held the Bankruptcy Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under the Medicare jurisdictional bar (42 U.S.C. § 405(h)) and reversed the Orders insofar as they affected the provider agreements, remanding for further proceedings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Bankruptcy Court could enjoin CMS/AHCA from terminating Medicare/Medicaid provider agreements pre-exhaustion | Bayou Shores: its provider agreements were estate property and bankruptcy jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1334) allowed injunctive relief and assumption | AHCA/Secretary: § 405(h) bars judicial interference until administrative remedies are exhausted; only § 405(g) review after final agency decision is permitted | The court held § 405(h) barred the Bankruptcy Court from enjoining termination prior to exhaustion; injunction reversed |
| Whether § 405(h) permits bankruptcy jurisdiction despite omission of § 1334 in the statute | Bayou Shores: § 405(h) text does not list § 1334, so bankruptcy jurisdiction remains available | AHCA/Secretary: legislative history and precedent show Congress intended the bar to preclude bankruptcy courts from adjudicating Medicare termination disputes | The court agreed with the majority view that § 405(h) precludes bankruptcy jurisdiction over such disputes |
| Whether the Confirmation Order could require assumption of the provider agreements | Bayou Shores: if agreements were executory contracts, bankruptcy could authorize assumption as estate relief | AHCA/Secretary: assuming agreements would interfere with CMS’s termination determination and circumvent administrative process | The court held the Confirmation Order’s assumption of provider agreements exceeded jurisdiction and reversed that portion |
| Whether the timing of actual termination matters to the jurisdictional analysis | Bayou Shores: disputes over whether termination pre-dated bankruptcy affect whether agreements were executory | AHCA/Secretary: timing does not cure lack of jurisdiction to delay or prevent effect of Secretary’s termination determination | The court held timing irrelevant: any action delaying/preventing the Secretary’s determination violated § 405(h) |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Astrue, 506 F.3d 1349 (11th Cir. 2007) (section 405(g) is the exclusive source of federal-court jurisdiction for Medicare disputes)
- Cathedral Rock of N. Coll. Hill v. Shalala, 223 F.3d 354 (6th Cir. 2000) (district courts lack jurisdiction to enjoin Medicare terminations pre-exhaustion)
- Affiliated Prof’l Home Health Care v. Shalala, 164 F.3d 282 (5th Cir. 1999) (administrative exhaustion required before judicial review of Medicare actions)
- Bodimetric Health Servs., Inc. v. Aetna Life & Cas., 903 F.2d 480 (7th Cir. 1990) (textual amendments to § 405(h) do not permit evasion of the jurisdictional bar)
- Livingston Care Ctr., Inc. v. United States, 934 F.2d 719 (6th Cir. 1991) (courts cannot enjoin Secretary’s termination decisions absent exhaustion)
- Americana Healthcare Corp. v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 1072 (7th Cir. 1982) (same)
- In re Hosp. Staffing Servs., Inc., 258 B.R. 53 (S.D. Fla. 2000) (bankruptcy courts lack jurisdiction over Medicare termination disputes under § 405(h))
