History
  • No items yet
midpage
142 Conn. App. 361
Conn. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Fitzgerald was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence after a deer-related collision and field sobriety tests.
  • At the state police barracks, Fitzgerald refused to submit to a breath test, wanting to speak with his attorney first.
  • Picheco advised testing could not be delayed, but Fitzgerald did not consent to testing.
  • The officer recorded Fitzgerald's refusal around 2:35 a.m.; Fitzgerald was released about 2:50 a.m. where his attorney was present in the lobby.
  • The commissioner suspended Fitzgerald's license for six months under § 14-227b, and the Superior Court upheld the decision.
  • On appeal, Fitzgerald argued there was insufficient evidence of a refusal given his intent to consult an attorney; the appellate court rejected this and affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Fitzgerald refused the test under § 14-227b(g)(3) Fitzgerald asserted he intended to consult an attorney before testing Dalmaso controls; any failure to submit constitutes a refusal Refusal upheld; Dalmaso controls
Whether right to consult attorney affects the four issues in § 14-227b(g) Right to speak with attorney is relevant to inquiry Hearing limited to four enumerated issues; right is not a dispositive factor Limited four issues rule governs; right to attorney does not negate refusal
Whether Dalmaso governs despite not involving right to telephone an attorney Distinct right to consult attorney should affect outcome Dalmaso applies; consultation rights do not negate a refusal Dalmaso controls; refusal still constitutes grounds for suspension

Key Cases Cited

  • Dalmaso v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 47 Conn. App. 839 (Conn. App. 1998) (right to consult attorney not material to four-issue licensing hearing; refusal sustained)
  • Volck v. Muzio, 204 Conn. 507 (Conn. 1987) (hearing limited to four enumerated issues)
  • Buckley v. Muzio, 200 Conn. 1 (Conn. 1986) (four-issue limitation; no broader review of testing consequences)
  • Santiago v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 134 Conn. App. 668 (Conn. App. 2012) (license suspension hearing expressly limited to § 14-227b(g) four issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Apr 30, 2013
Citations: 142 Conn. App. 361; 65 A.3d 533; 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 218; 2013 WL 1732910; AC 34870
Docket Number: AC 34870
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 142 Conn. App. 361