First National Bank of Izard County v. B & H Resources, LLC
1:15-cv-00005
E.D. Ark.Aug 8, 2017Background
- First National Bank of Izard County (FNBIC) sued Northstar Farms, LLC to foreclose a mortgage securing a promissory note originally for $320,230.65 dated August 7, 2009; Northstar defaulted.
- Gibsland Bank & Trust (Gibsland) filed a third‑party complaint asserting it holds a mortgage on the same Izard County real property securing a $1.2 million promissory note to Coil Tubing Intervention Services, LLC; Coil Tubing defaulted.
- Northstar was properly served with Gibsland’s third‑party pleadings but failed to respond; the clerk entered default and a default judgment in favor of Gibsland.
- The court found FNBIC’s earlier summary judgment against Northstar established FNBIC’s entitlement to in rem relief for its note and mortgage.
- The court determined the property descriptions overlap and that FNBIC’s mortgage is prior and paramount to Gibsland’s mortgage; Gibsland’s lien is superior to other parties’ equities.
- The court entered in rem money judgments: FNBIC for $376,023.81 plus daily interest, costs, and $35,860 attorney’s fee; Gibsland for $1,363,659.87 plus daily interest, costs, and fees; authorized public sale and directed marshalship and priority distribution of proceeds.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Entitlement to in rem judgment and foreclosure for FNBIC | FNBIC: summary judgment shows Northstar defaulted on note; mortgage secures debt; entitled to judgment and foreclosure | Northstar: did not respond/defend (default) | Court awarded FNBIC in rem judgment for principal, interest, costs, and attorney fee and foreclosure remedy |
| 2. Gibsland’s right to enforce its mortgage against the same property | Gibsland: holds a valid recorded mortgage securing a defaulted $1.2M promissory note; entitled to in rem judgment, fees, and foreclosure | Northstar (nonresponding) — default established allegations as true | Court entered in rem judgment for Gibsland (amounts, per diem interest, costs, attorney fees) |
| 3. Relative priority of liens between FNBIC and Gibsland | FNBIC: its mortgage lien predates and is superior to Gibsland’s lien | Gibsland: asserted mortgage but did not overcome priority claim | Court held FNBIC’s lien is first, valid, and paramount; Gibsland’s lien is inferior to FNBIC but superior to other equities |
| 4. Remedies, sale procedure, and fee allocation | Both lenders: seek foreclosure sale, marshal to conduct sale, proceeds applied to satisfy judgments and fees | N/A (no opposing response) | Court authorized public auction, directed marshal to sell, and specified application of proceeds: costs then FNBIC judgment then Gibsland judgment; awarded specified attorney’s fees and costs |
Key Cases Cited
- None (opinion does not cite any reported cases).
