History
  • No items yet
midpage
First Fin. Bank, FSB v. Doellman
2013 Ohio 1383
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • First Financial Bank, FSB foreclosed after assigning the note and mortgage to U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Trial court entered judgment of foreclosure; this court later remanded for trial on remaining issues.
  • Magistrate found U.S. Bank entitled to foreclose for default and that notice of default was properly provided.
  • May 5, 2004 demand letter was mailed to the Doellmans at the property address; certified mail unclaimed, ordinary mail also used.
  • Doellmans testified they never received the May 5 letter; the trial court credited credibility to the bank’s evidence that mailing created a presumption of receipt via ordinary mail.
  • Doellmans argued they attempted to cure and offered money after the cure period; court concluded no timely cure and accelerated the loan.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there a required notice of default actually received? Bank mailed a proper default notice with 30-day cure period; ordinary mail creates presumptive receipt. Doellmans did not receive the May 5, 2004 notice; mailing alone cannot prove actual receipt. No reversible error; presumption supported by ordinary-mail delivery; not clearly against weight of the evidence.
Did Doellmans have a timely opportunity to cure before acceleration and foreclosure? Doellmans failed to cure within the cure period and later payments were insufficient to bring current. Doellmans attempted to cure with $4,000 and additional payments but Bank refused because cure was past due. No reversible error; court found Doellmans failed to cure and Bank accelerated per the note and mortgage.

Key Cases Cited

  • Cantrell v. Celotex Corp., 105 Ohio App.3d 90 (Ohio App. Dist. 1st Dist.1995) (rebuttable mailbox rule; receipt can be presumed from mailing)
  • Wilborn v. Bank One Corp., 2009-Ohio-306 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009) (consideration of amounts owed including enforcement costs in curing default)
  • Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328 (2012-Ohio-2179) (standard for manifest-weight review; deference to trial court findings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: First Fin. Bank, FSB v. Doellman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 8, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 1383
Docket Number: CA2012-05-112
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.