467 F. App'x 723
9th Cir.2012Background
- Toledo, a Brazilian native, has lived in the United States since age six on a nonimmigrant visa.
- She has an approved 1-130 based on marriage to a U.S. citizen and holds a college education with no criminal record.
- Toledo has never returned to Brazil and is not fluent in Portuguese, factors relevant to her eligibility and adjustment considerations.
- Her case was reviewed under the Morton memo framework, indicating potential satisfaction of certain administrative relief criteria for relief from removal.
- The BIA denied Toledo’s motion to reopen removal proceedings to apply for adjustment of status.
- The petition for review challenges the BIA’s denial, raising an equitable tolling claim that time limits should be tolled given diligence and lack of opportunity to file earlier.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Toledo properly exhausted equitable tolling. | Toledo argues tolling was raised in the reply brief, properly exhausting. | The BIA allegedly did not address tolling and the issue was not properly exhausted. | Petition granted on exhaustion grounds; remand for tolling determination. |
| Whether the BIA abused its discretion by not addressing equitable tolling. | The BIA should consider tolling as raised in the reply brief. | The BIA’s failure to address tolling constitutes an abuse when denying the motion to reopen. | Abuse found; remand for tolling ruling. |
| Whether remand for consideration of equitable tolling is appropriate. | Toledo is entitled to equitable tolling consideration on remand. | No tolling discussion occurred at BIA level; case should be decided without tolling. | Remanded to address tolling in the first instance. |
Key Cases Cited
- Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2002) (review of BIA abuse of discretion for motions to reopen)
- Brezilien v. Holder, 569 F.3d 403 (9th Cir. 2009) (exhaustion shown when issue raised in final BIA brief)
- Zhang v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 713 (9th Cir. 2004) (exhaustion via mentioning issue in BIA briefing)
- Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2009) (exhaustion via brief discussion of issue)
- Singh v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2005) (remand when BIA denied without addressing tolling)
