midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
687 F.3d 39
1st Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Fernandes sued AGAR in federal court under diversity jurisdiction for negligence arising from an injury in a tire shed on AGAR's Taunton property leased to Penske.
  • The tire shed was an old shipping container used for tire storage, located on premises leased to Penske, with Penske and AGAR sharing different facility rights.
  • Paragraph 29 of the lease obligated AGAR to maintain and repair the garage's structural components and utilities, not specifically the tire shed or container.
  • Penske controlled and used the tire shed; AGAR never maintained or repaired the tire shed during Penske's lease, and Penske kept the key to the shed.
  • Fernandes knew of holes in the shed's floor; Penske employees attempted repairs but were told by their superiors that AGAR would not fund repairs.
  • After Fernandes's injury, Penske removed the shed and replaced it with a different container under a separate lease.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether AGAR owed Fernandes a duty to repair under Humphrey v. Byron Fernandes argues AGAR contracted to repair the tire shed. AGAR's obligation limited to the garage as defined in the lease; tire shed not included. No duty; lease limited AGAR's repair obligation to the garage.

Key Cases Cited

  • Humphrey v. Byron, 850 N.E.2d 1044 (Mass. 2006) (lessor duties in commercial leases depend on contract and common areas)
  • Remy v. MacDonald, 801 N.E.2d 260 (Mass. 2004) (duty depends on contractual undertakings and leased area)
  • Chausse v. Coz, 540 N.E.2d 667 (Mass. 1989) (common areas under landlord control affect duty)
  • Lumber Mut. Ins. Co. v. Zoltek Corp., 647 N.E.2d 395 (Mass. 1995) (contract interpretation governs when terms are unambiguous)
  • Afarian v. Mass. Elec. Co., 866 N.E.2d 901 (Mass. 2007) (summary judgment appropriate where law resolves duty question)
  • Farmers Ins. Exch. v. RNK, Inc., 632 F.3d 777 (1st Cir. 2011) (summary judgment appropriate when plain lease terms favor one side)
  • Guay v. Burack, 677 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2012) (de novo review for lease interpretation under Massachusetts law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Fernandes v. Agar Supply Company, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Jul 30, 2012
Citations: 687 F.3d 39; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15713; 2012 WL 3064411; 11-1772
Docket Number: 11-1772
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
Log In