History
  • No items yet
midpage
773 F. Supp. 2d 1273
M.D. Fla.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • LBP developed golf club facilities and Shadow Wood Preserve; Feldkamps entered into a real estate purchase and obtained a $92,000 resident golf membership deposit with a $30,000 credit toward the deposit.
  • The deposit was to be refunded 100% within 30 days after written resignation, or after 30 years if later, under the Membership Plan and related documents.
  • The Feldkamps signed an Addendum acknowledging refund terms, and LBP accepted their membership despite a signed Addendum attempting to modify terms.
  • LBP suspended the refund policy in 2008 and later refused to refund the deposit after the Feldkamps resigned with written notice dated March 18, 2009.
  • The case was filed April 27, 2009; the court granted partial summary judgment on Counts I and II, dismissed Count IV, and denied mootness arguments while addressing Counts III and IV.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Contract existence and interpretation of refund obligation Feldkamps argue a 100% refund within 30 days, not subject to unilateral amendment LBP claims amendment rights apply to Membership Plan but not the refund obligation Refund obligation vested and unilaterally suspending/amending violated contract terms.
Whether LBP could unilaterally suspend or amend the refund No unilateral change; refund rights fixed by contract Reservation to amend permitted changes to Club rights Unilateral suspension/amendment of the refund obligation is unenforceable.
Proper measure of damages for breach Recover $92,000 plus related credits Credit and other considerations reduce recoverable amount Damages awarded: $92,000 plus prejudgment interest; exclusion of non-breaching-house damages.
FUFTA claim viability Count IV pled fraud/transfer schemes Pleading deficiencies persist; insufficient transfers identified Count IV dismissed for failure to plead with Rule 8 precision and necessary parties.

Key Cases Cited

  • First Florida Bank v. Fin. Transaction Sys., Inc., 522 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (cannot amend bylaw to deprive vested contractual rights; bylaw amendments not to impair contract rights)
  • Johnson Enters. of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Grp., Inc., 162 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 1998) (illusory contract where promisor retains broad unilateral discretion)
  • Hamlet Country Club, Inc. v. Allen, 622 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (club contract interpreted by its terms; bylaws amendments do not defeat vested rights)
  • Susi v. St. Andrews Country Club, Inc., 727 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (bylaws amendment context; distinguish from fixed refund promise in contract)
  • Rose v. M/V Gulf Stream Falcon, 186 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir. 1999) (plain language governs; read contract as whole to give effect to terms)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Feldkamp v. Long Bay Partners, LLC
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Florida
Date Published: Feb 18, 2011
Citations: 773 F. Supp. 2d 1273; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16683; 2011 WL 693576; 8:09-cv-00253
Docket Number: 8:09-cv-00253
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Fla.
Log In
    Feldkamp v. Long Bay Partners, LLC, 773 F. Supp. 2d 1273