History
  • No items yet
midpage
FEI Enterprises Inc. v. Yoon
194 Cal. App. 4th 790
| Cal. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • FEI Enterprises, Inc. (FEI) provided low-voltage electrical subcontracting work on two Los Angeles projects for Pacific Construction Co. (a general contractor) and owner Kee Man Yoon.
  • FEI asserted breach of contract damages and sought prompt payment penalties for late payments under the subcontracts.
  • Pacific Construction cross-claimed FEI breached the subcontracts.
  • The trial court awarded FEI on its complaint and against Pacific Construction on the cross-claim, denying FEI penalties based on a finding of a good faith dispute.
  • Projects involved: Gramercy Drive (Gramercy Project) and Manhattan Place (Manhattan Place Project); owners were Kim and Yoon respectively.
  • The appellate court affirmed the trial court, holding the good faith-dispute standard applied to penalties was objective and supported by the record.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standards for good faith dispute under §7108.5(c) FEI argues an objective standard should apply. Pacific Construction argues a subjective standard should apply. Objectively applied standard governs good faith dispute.
Existence of good faith dispute in withholding payments FEI contends no bona fide dispute existed about amounts due. Pacific Construction contends there was a legitimate dispute about FEI's performance and amount due. There was an objectively reasonable good faith dispute; penalties denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America, 133 Cal.App.4th 1319 (Cal.App.4th 2005) (defined good faith dispute in 7108.5 context (objective vs. subjective))
  • Denver D. Darling, Inc. v. Controlled Environments Construction, Inc., 89 Cal.App.4th 1221 (Cal.App.4th 2001) (bona fide dispute where contract interpretation reasonable)
  • Thompson Pacific Construction, Inc. v. City of Sunnyvale, 155 Cal.App.4th 525 (Cal.App.4th 2007) (good faith dispute in public contract context)
  • Martin Brothers Construction, Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Construction, Inc., 179 Cal.App.4th 1401 (Cal.App.4th 2009) (footnote discusses bona fide vs good faith)
  • Guntert v. City of Stockton, 43 Cal.App.3d 203 (Cal.App.3d 1974) (context for objective standard vs sole discretion)
  • Barnhill v. Robert Saunders & Co., 125 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal.App.3d 1981) (good faith dispute related to setoff/penalties)
  • People v. Nunn, 46 Cal.2d 460 (Cal. 1956) (definition of good faith in state of mind context)
  • Locke v. Warner Bros., Inc., 57 Cal.App.4th 354 (Cal.App.4th 1997) (subjective satisfaction cases vs objective preference)
  • Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., 100 Cal.App.4th 44 (Cal.App.4th 2002) (objective reasonableness standard favored)
  • Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co., 42 Cal.4th 713 (Cal.4th 2007) (insurance bad faith context supporting objective view)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: FEI Enterprises Inc. v. Yoon
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 25, 2011
Citation: 194 Cal. App. 4th 790
Docket Number: No. B209862
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.