History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fed. Home Loan Mtge. v. Zuga
2013 Ohio 2838
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Foreclosure action filed Aug 31, 2010; default judgment entered; decree of foreclosure Mar 15, 2011.
  • Appellant moved for relief from judgment and stayed sheriff’s sale; trial court granted relief and allowed an answer to foreclosure.
  • Appellee moved for summary judgment supported by Kerrigan affidavit attesting to ownership, records, and notice; Blanton affidavit details acceleration and notices.
  • Kerrigan stated appellee is servicing agent and has personal knowledge; original note produced at deposition.
  • Assignment of Mortgage from Home Savings to appellee executed Jul 27, 2009, recorded shortly after; February 28, 2009 notice of default mailed.
  • Appellant contested holder status and compliance with notice; trial court granted summary judgment and set sheriff’s sale for Oct 18, 2012; stay of sale granted pending appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Holder status of the note and mortgage Zuga argues Kerrigan lacks possession/verified holder status Zuga contends appellee is not the holder; custodian evidence insufficient Appellee demonstrated holder status; genuine issue not shown
Notice of default compliance Kerrigan letter complied with promissory note terms Home Savings只是 servicing agent; notice insufficient Notice satisfied contractual requirements; no issue material
Summary judgment appropriate given evidence There are unresolved facts about notice and holder Record supports enforcement and possession No genuine issues; trial court properly granted summary judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (1996) (burden-shifting framework for Civ.R. 56)
  • Temple v. Wean United, Inc., 50 Ohio St.2d 317 (1977) (summary judgment standard; de novo review on appeal)
  • Schwartzwald v. Gehman, 134 Ohio St.3d 13 (2012) (standing to sue; real party in interest in foreclosure)
  • Wachovia Bank v. Jackson, 2011-Ohio-3203 (5th Dist.) (holder of note and mortgage; evidentiary burden in foreclosure)
  • U.S. Bank v. Adams, 2012-Ohio-6253 (6th Dist.) (possession of note; demonstrates standing)
  • GMAC Mortgage, L.L.C. v. Jacobs, 2011-Ohio-1780 (9th Dist.) (notice of default compliance in foreclosure)
  • Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Greene, 2011-Ohio-1976 (6th Dist.) (standing and enforceability in foreclosure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Fed. Home Loan Mtge. v. Zuga
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 28, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 2838
Docket Number: 2012-T-0038
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.