midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2011 Ohio 689
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Maxim Enterprises, Inc. subcontracted lawn and property preservation work to Father & Son Property Maintenance, LLC in 2008 under an oral agreement.
  • The contract required before-payment conditions: the work had to be completed on time, photos taken, and payment to Father & Son only after Maxim received payment from the bank.
  • Maxim routinely paid for late work orders without bank payment, and assured payment despite the bank’s delay.
  • Father & Son performed services, and Maxim paid approximately $63,602.90, but several invoices totaling $14,045.70 remained unpaid.
  • Plaintiff filed suit in Canton Municipal Court seeking breach of contract, account, and unjust enrichment; Maxim answered and a bench trial was held.
  • The trial court found that Maxim waived the conditions precedent by continuing to pay and accepting late work, and awarded Father & Son $11,545.70, which Maxim appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Waiver of a condition precedent Father & Son asserts Maxim waived the condition precedent through late payments and assurances of payment. Maxim argues the condition precedent cannot be waived; any payment before bank receipt was not a permissible waiver. Waiver affirmed; Maxim estopped from enforcing the condition precedent.
Damages calculation Evidence supports the claimed amount of $11,545.70 for work performed. The trial court ignored extensive evidence showing noncompliance and underpaid/overlooked evidence. Damages supported; no abuse of discretion; affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Latina v. Woodpath Development Co., 57 Ohio St.3d 212 (1991) (contract interpretation to give effect to intent)
  • Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216 (2003-Ohio-5849) (duty to interpret contract in context of surrounding facts)
  • Hamilton Ins. Serv. Inc. v. Nationwide Ins. Cos., 86 Ohio St.3d 270 (1999) (contract interpretation and intent)
  • Ohio Farmer's Ins. Co. v. Cochran, 104 Ohio St.427 (1922) (waiver by conduct; action for waiver established)
  • Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77 (1984) (credibility and weight of evidence lie with trier of fact)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230 (1967) (testimony credibility standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Father & Son Property Maintenance, L.L.C. v. Maxim Ents., Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 14, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 689; 2010 CA 00116
Docket Number: 2010 CA 00116
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In