Farmington Square Condominium Association v. Keith Mitan
366946
Mich. Ct. App.Aug 11, 2025Background
- Defendant Keith Mitan, as personal representative and later owner of a condo unit, had repeated disputes with Farmington Square Condominium Association over unpaid assessments and leasing practices.
- Previous litigation (2018 case) between the parties ended with a foreclosure judgment against Mitan for unpaid assessments; appellate review affirmed in most respects.
- In the current 2020 case, the Association sued Mitan and unknown tenants for continued failure to provide tenant information, violating bylaws linked to rental disclosures and rent diversion rights.
- Mitan counterclaimed against the Association and several board members, raising nine claims including denial of access to utilities and claiming improper recording of a lien.
- Summary judgment was granted favoring the Association and individual counter-defendants on all key issues, including issuance of a permanent injunction and award of attorney fees.
- Mitan appealed, challenging the injunction’s breadth, summary judgment rulings, fee award, and dismissals of his counterclaims.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Injunction specificity & reference | Injunction tied to specific leasing-by-law provisions | Overly broad/vague; improperly incorporates documents by reference | Injunction is sufficiently specific and any improper reference to documents is harmless error as defendant knew their terms. |
| Application of res judicata | Not barred; prior action not final at time of new claim | Prior (2018) claim ongoing, so new case is barred | Not barred; res judicata requires a final judgment in prior case, which wasn’t present when this case was filed. |
| Proper forum & statutory remedies | Action proper in circuit court as alternative equitable remedy allowed | Must proceed via district court summary proceedings for evictions | Circuit court jurisdiction proper; statute gives Association options between remedies, and equitable relief was available. |
| Attorney fee award (including paralegal, scope) | entitled to fees by bylaws & statute, including appellate fees | Includes paralegal work without proof of qualification; amount excessive | Fees award reversed only as to unqualified paralegal hours. Association may seek appellate fees. Other challenges rejected. |
| Dismissal of counterclaims | No actionable right/party or damages for claims re: access and liens | Denied damages from lost utility access and improper lien | Dismissal affirmed: No damages, not an owner at time of denial, and no bylaws breach regarding contractor’s independent lien. |
Key Cases Cited
- Adair v. Michigan, 470 Mich 105 (scope of res judicata doctrine in Michigan)
- Kosiel v. Arrow Liquors Corp., 446 Mich 374 (requirement of final judgment for res judicata)
- Chapel v. Hull, 60 Mich 167 (damages for violation of injunction permissible)
- Janini v. London Townhouses Condo Ass’n, 514 Mich 86 (nature of condominium common element rights)
- Barclae v. Zarb, 300 Mich App 445 (standing/real party in interest principals)
