History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 COA 3
Colo. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Farmer, an inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to pay the filing fee.
  • Complaint alleged excessive force by unnamed prison employees; named CDOC Executive Director Clements and warden Trani as defendants.
  • Farmer sought in forma pauperis status but did not complete the required paperwork.
  • District court denied in forma pauperis status due to three prior dismissals for frivolous/motion state grounds or immunity issues and ordered payment of the filing fee within 20 days.
  • Farmer moved for reconsideration with three arguments; district court denied and dismissed the case for nonpayment.
  • Court affirms the dismissal and upholds application of section 18-17.5-102.7.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 18-17.5-102.7 violates access to courts. Farmer argues the statute violates access to the courts. Defendant contends the statute is constitutional and does not deny access to courts. § 18-17.5-102.7 does not violate access to the courts.
Whether the prior three dismissals qualify under § 18-17.5-102.7. Farmer argues dismissals did not qualify as grounds under § 18-17.5-102.7. Defendant contends each dismissal qualifies as a strike under the statute. Each prior dismissal qualifies as a § 18-17.5-102.7 dismissal.
Whether Farmer may collaterally attack prior dismissals to avoid § 18-17.5-102.7. Farmer claims he should collaterally attack prior dismissals to avoid the statute. Defendant argues collateral attacks are not permitted; direct appeal is the proper remedy. Collateral attacks are not allowed; direct appeal is required.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (U.S. 1977) (right to access to courts and deep analysis of access rights)
  • Kras, 409 U.S. 434 (U.S. 1973) (filing fee considerations for indigent litigants)
  • White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 1998) (access-to-courts considerations for inmate filings)
  • Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719 (11th Cir. 1998) (analysis of access rights and filing fees)
  • Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 1999) (federal § 1915(g) guidance informing Colorado statute)
  • Pointer v. Wilkinson, 502 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2007) (precedent on prior dismissals and § 1915(g) applicability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Farmer v. Raemisch
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 2, 2014
Citations: 2014 COA 3; 320 P.3d 394; 2014 Colo. App. LEXIS 5; 2014 WL 43119; Court of Appeals No. 12CA2267
Docket Number: Court of Appeals No. 12CA2267
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    Farmer v. Raemisch, 2014 COA 3