midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
225 N.C. App. 685
N.C. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1992, Ridgewood Apartments was acquired for $5,150,000 with $4.6 million funded by a seller and $550,000 from the Trust.
  • On 28 October 1994, Quicksilver, the successor entity, executed a promissory note to the Trust and a Trust Deed encumbering the property.
  • Quicksilver defaulted on the Trust Note; the Trust demanded payment and several payments were made over years, but default remained
  • Wachovia later loaned funds to Quicksilver; the Wachovia Deed and a subordination agreement were recorded in 1999–2000.
  • Quicksilver refinanced with Lend Lease in 2001, executing the FNMA Note and FNMA Deed; FNMA later acquired the loan via assignment.
  • FNMA foreclosed in 2011; FNMA purchased the property; the Trust demanded payoff and filed declaratory judgment and foreclosure-related actions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Trust lien remains valid and superior to FNMA Trust claims superior lien due to recording first FNMA asserts lien priority via statutory mechanisms or subrogation Trust lien remains valid and superior; summary judgment reversed
Whether the Trust lien expired under the new life-of-lien statute Statute unconstitutional as retroactive to vest rights Statute automatically expires liens per §45-36.24(b) Statute applied but unconstitutional as applied; lien not extinguished
Whether equitable subrogation allows FNMA to take Wachovia's priority Lender subrogation should grant FNMA Wachovia’s priority Equitable subrogation applies under Wallace; FNMA would gain priority Subrogation denied; not equitable to grant priority to FNMA
Whether the Trust could foreclose despite FNMA’s foreclosure order Trust has superior lien and may foreclose Foreclosure extinguished other interests Trust foreclosure right preserved; reverse the foreclosure reversal

Key Cases Cited

  • Smith v. Davis, 228 N.C. 172 (1947) (concerning conclusive presumption timing under 45-37)
  • Rowe v. Walker, 114 N.C. App. 36 (1994) (pure race jurisdiction; first to record governs)
  • Wallace v. Brenner, 200 N.C. 124 (1931) (equitable subrogation; exceptions for volunteers and culpable negligence)
  • Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 242 N.C. 1 (1955) (subrogation and excusable ignorance considerations)
  • First Union Nat. Bank of North Carolina v. Lindley Laboratories, Inc., 132 N.C. App. 129 (1999) (subrogation limits; intervening lienholder prejudice considerations)
  • In re Will of Jones, 362 N.C. 569 (2008) (summary judgment standard de novo review)
  • Forbis v. Neal, 361 N.C. 519 (2007) (summary judgment standards and deference to correct result)
  • Brown, 324 N.C. 427 (1989) (summary judgment: sustain on any ground)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Falk v. Fannie Mae
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 5, 2013
Citations: 225 N.C. App. 685; 738 S.E.2d 404; No. COA12-764
Docket Number: No. COA12-764
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In