History
  • No items yet
midpage
Factor King, LLC v. Block Builders, LLC
193 F. Supp. 3d 651
M.D. La.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Block Builders (general contractor) subcontracted BMP to perform work on a parking garage; the subcontract required BMP to hold progress payments in trust for suppliers and allowed Builders to make joint checks to BMP and suppliers.
  • BMP assigned its accounts (including Invoice #6 and Invoice #7) to Factor King under a factoring agreement; Factor notified Builders of the assignment and obtained a signed Invoice Letter from Builders for Invoice #7.
  • For Invoice #6, Builders paid suppliers by joint check and paid Factor the remainder; Factor did not object. For Invoice #7, Builders later reduced the invoice amount, issued joint checks paying suppliers directly, but did not pay Factor; Factor recorded a lien for the full Invoice #7 amount.
  • Factor sued Builders (and later added property owner Vintala) alleging breach of contract, detrimental reliance, wrongful payment, lien foreclosure, and open account; Builders counterclaimed for improper lien and sought recoupment.
  • Parties submitted a stipulated set of facts and three agreed disputed legal questions focused on: (1) whether BMP could assign supplier portions of Invoice #7 to Factor; (2) whether Builders had to pay suppliers before Factor; and (3) whether Builders could unilaterally reduce Invoice #7.
  • The court granted cross-motions for summary judgment in part: holding Factor entitled only to $25,702.47 from Invoice #7 (invoice total minus amounts paid to suppliers), entering judgment for Builders/Vintala on most of Factor’s claims, and for Factor on Builders’ improper-lien claim in reduced amount.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Factor is entitled to full Invoice #7 (including supplier portions) after BMP assigned receivables Factor: Notices of assignment and signed Invoice Letter entitle it to full $215,077.82 Builders: Subcontract (and joint pay agreements) require supplier amounts be paid first; assignee takes subject to those terms Held: Assignee (Factor) is subject to subcontract and joint-pay modifications; Builders properly paid suppliers; Factor limited to remainder ($25,702.47)
Whether Builders had to pay suppliers before paying Factor Factor: Invoice Letter obligates Builders to pay Factor on invoice due date Builders: Subcontract trust clause and joint-pay agreements permit/require paying suppliers first Held: Builders could pay suppliers first under subcontract and joint agreements; Factor not entitled to supplier payments
Whether Builders could unilaterally reduce Invoice #7 for incomplete work Factor: Invoice Letter acknowledged invoice correctness; reduction not permitted without consent Builders: Work incomplete; entitled to reduce invoice to reflect defective/unfinished work Held: Builders failed to present evidence of damages/cost to complete; unilateral reduction unsupported — summary judgment for Factor on this issue (no valid reduction)
Validity/foreclosure of Factor's lien for full invoice amount Factor: Lien for full invoice valid; seeks foreclosure Builders/Vintala: Lien improper because Factor not entitled to supplier amounts; seek cancellation/damages Held: Lien validly filed but cannot be enforced for full amount; Factor entitled only to reduced amount; Builders/Vintala failed to show they satisfied statutory cancellation prerequisites

Key Cases Cited

  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (summary judgment standard for genuine dispute of material fact)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (party opposing summary judgment must show existence of essential element)
  • Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069 (nonmoving party cannot rely on conclusory allegations at summary judgment)
  • Lillis v. Anderson, 21 So.2d 389 (contractor entitled to contract price absent owner proof of damages for partial default)
  • Suire v. Lafayette City-Par., 907 So.2d 37 (elements of detrimental reliance)
  • Frey Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Foster, 996 So.2d 969 (open account definition and analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Factor King, LLC v. Block Builders, LLC
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Date Published: Feb 29, 2016
Citation: 193 F. Supp. 3d 651
Docket Number: CIVIL ACTION NO.: 14-00587-BAJ-RLB
Court Abbreviation: M.D. La.