History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex Parte Graves
04-16-00570-CV
| Tex. App. | Jul 26, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Joshua Michael Graves filed a verified petition to expunge records of his 1996 DWI arrest.
  • Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) answered, generally denying and asserting Graves was ineligible because the arrest led to a conviction and court-ordered community supervision.
  • On March 10, 2016, the trial court signed an order granting expunction.
  • The official court reporter informed the appellate court that no reporter’s record exists for any hearing on that date.
  • DPS timely filed a restricted appeal asserting multiple errors, including that Graves was ineligible and that no hearing transcript was made.
  • The Fourth Court of Appeals reversed and remanded based on the absence of a reporter’s record, following its precedent.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Graves) Defendant's Argument (DPS) Held
1. Eligibility for expunction given a conviction and community supervision Graves sought expunction of his 1996 arrest records DPS argued Graves is ineligible because arrest resulted in conviction and community supervision Not resolved on merits due to lack of reporter’s record; review not possible on face of record
2. Legal sufficiency of evidence supporting expunction Graves relied on his verified petition and court order DPS contended evidence is legally insufficient, especially given general denial Cannot determine without reporter’s record; appellate court did not address sufficiency on the merits
3. Whether trial court erred by granting expunction without holding a hearing Graves obtained an order expunging records (court order references art. 55 and Tex. Alc. Bev. Code) DPS asserted the court either held an unreported hearing or issued order without hearing, which is improper Presence or absence of a hearing could not be established on the record; appellate review precluded by missing reporter’s record
4. Effect of absence of a reporter’s record on restricted appeal Graves relied on the record on file (no reporter’s record provided) DPS asserted absence of reporter’s record prevents review and requires reversal/remand Held for DPS: because no reporter’s record exists and DPS complained, the order is reversed and the cause remanded for new proceedings

Key Cases Cited

  • Ins. Co. of State of Pa. v. Lejeune, 297 S.W.3d 254 (Tex. 2009) (elements required for a restricted appeal)
  • Norman Commc’ns v. Tex. Eastman Co., 955 S.W.2d 269 (Tex. 1997) (face of the record includes reporter’s record for restricted appeals)
  • Flores v. Brimex Ltd. P’ship, 5 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999) (review of legal sufficiency in restricted appeal context)
  • Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Ibarra, 444 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2014) (remand not required where record shows no evidence presented at expunction hearing)
  • Ex parte K.R.K., 446 S.W.3d 540 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014) (applicant must present evidence beyond a verified petition when DPS files a general denial)
  • Findlay v. State, 9 S.W.3d 397 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999) (distinguishing expunction availability for DUI vs. DWI convictions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Graves
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jul 26, 2017
Docket Number: 04-16-00570-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.