midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
473 B.R. 703
6th Cir. BAP
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Thomas and Patricia Cottingham are married; Patricia pled guilty to felony embezzlement from Cardiology Associates in 1999 and was on probation with restitution.
  • Patricia later worked for Spaces, Inc. as an administrative assistant/bookkeeper, with Spaces’ owner controlling accounting but not check signing authority.
  • Patricia embezzled funds from Spaces, Inc. beginning in 2001, with annual amounts increasing through 2008; embezzled funds were funneled into the couple’s joint accounts and used for lavish spending.
  • Thomas, a construction supervisor, had ongoing financial obligations and significant undisclosed spending; the couple’s expenditures far exceeded their earned income.
  • The Debtors’ joint accounts were used to deposit embezzled funds; Thomas had access to and participated in the couple’s finances, including signing checks and benefiting from purchases.
  • In 2006–2007, purchases (e.g., a Jeep Commander, home improvements) and loans were financed with embezzled funds; Patricia embezzled tens of thousands yearly and forged a Spaces, Inc. credit card account.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the finding of conspiracy to convert funds was clearly erroneous Cottingham engaged in a civil conspiracy by participating in Patricia's embezzlement and use of funds. Cottingham did not knowingly participate; he should not be held liable for his spouse’s actions. Not clearly erroneous; court upheld conspiracy finding.
Whether Cottingham caused willful and malicious injury to Spaces, Inc. Cottingham knowingly participated in converting embezzled funds for joint benefit. Cottingham lacked the requisite willful/malicious intent to cause injury. Willful and malicious injury established; debt nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6).

Key Cases Cited

  • Markowitz v. Campbell (In re Markowitz), 190 F.3d 455 (6th Cir. 1999) (defines willful injury as intended consequences or substantial certainty)
  • Gonzalez v. Moffitt (In re Moffitt), 252 B.R. 916 (6th Cir. BAP 2000) (discusses willful/malicious injury standard and conspiracy concepts)
  • Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946) (liability of conspirators for acts of co-conspirators in furtherance of conspiracy)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ewers v. Cottingham (In re Cottingham)
Court Name: Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 15, 2012
Citations: 473 B.R. 703; BAP No. 11-8042
Docket Number: BAP No. 11-8042
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir. BAP
Log In
    Ewers v. Cottingham (In re Cottingham), 473 B.R. 703