Evans v. Evans
145 So. 3d 1093
La. Ct. App.2014Background
- Married in 2003; no children.
- June 18, 2013: wife filed for divorce in Caldwell Parish seeking interim and permanent spousal support and health insurance.
- Oct. 2, 2013: interim support hearing; court awarded $2,800/month and insurance, enjoined disposition of community property.
- Judgment signed Nov. 5, 2013; interim support to begin Oct. 1, 2013; both parties appealed.
- Husband challenges need and living standard conclusions; record shows husband’s income increase and wife’s monthly expenses.
- Court affirmed trial court’s ruling on interim spousal support.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether wife proved need for interim support | Evans | Evans | No abuse; need established |
| Whether Evans was properly deemed unable to meet living standard | Evans | Evans | Court did not abuse discretion in standard of living finding |
| Whether trial court properly considered earning capacity vs. employment status | Evans | Evans | Court credited wife’s credibility; no error in assessing earning capacity |
| Whether interim support amount was appropriate given assets and lifestyle | Evans | Evans | Affirmed amount; within discretion based on needs and ability to pay |
| Whether the start date of interim support was proper | Evans | Evans | Start date within trial ruling; affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Bickham v. Bickham, 58 So.3d 950 (La.App.2d Cir. 2011) (interim support factors and discretion emphasized)
- Brown v. Brown, 31 So.3d 532 (La.App.2d Cir. 2010) (standard of living and ability to pay balance)
- Shirley v. Shirley, 127 So.3d 935 (La.App.2d Cir. 2013) (trial court’s discretion in interim spousal support upheld)
- Clark v. Clark, 779 So.2d 822 (La.App.2d Cir. 2000) (voluntary unemployment vs. earning capacity considerations)
- Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick, 948 So.2d 390 (La.App.2d Cir. 2007) (imputed income where appropriate for interim support)
- Arrendell v. Arrendell, 390 So.2d 927 (La.App.2d Cir. 1980) (alimony pendente lite purposes and consideration of earning capacity)
