History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eunice McKibben v. Jeff Hughes, b/n/f Joyce Hughes
23 N.E.3d 819
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Hughes conveyed a quitclaim deed of his house (the Property) to long-time acquaintance Eunice McKibben in April 2010; he received $1; later he alleged he was vulnerable from mental illness and that McKibben induced the transfer.
  • McKibben and Hughes had a joint bank account into which Hughes’s Social Security benefits were deposited; by statute the account funds were treated as belonging to Hughes absent clear evidence otherwise.
  • Between the deed transfer and McKibben’s removal from the joint account (Dec. 2011), checks from the account paid Property-related items: 14 "rent" checks ($400 each) and other utility/insurance payments; McKibben signed many of these checks.
  • McKibben also made repairs to the residence (windows, roof), totaling $8,200; Hughes testified McKibben used cash ($17,800 he had given her for safekeeping) and other of his funds for repairs and purchases.
  • Hughes sued seeking rescission of the deed (constructive fraud, unjust enrichment, incompetence) and reimbursement for funds McKibben withdrew or spent; the trial court denied rescission but awarded Hughes $14,879.55 (checks + repairs).
  • On appeal the court affirmed denial of rescission, found a confidential relationship in fact existed, upheld liability for the repairs and most withdrawals, but corrected the math and remanded to enter judgment for $15,679.55.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Hughes) Defendant's Argument (McKibben) Held
Whether deed should be rescinded for constructive fraud (confidential/fiduciary relationship + misrepresentation) McKibben had a confidential relationship with Hughes, told him Medicaid would take his house, induced transfer => rescission Denies misrepresentation; asserts no fiduciary duty; disputes Medicaid motive Court: Confidential relationship in fact existed, but no proven misrepresentation/omission in violation of duty; rescission denied
Whether deed should be set aside for unjust enrichment (cohabitation) Cohabitation unjustly enriched McKibben, warranting setting aside deed Argument not raised below; no relief should be granted Waived on appeal; not considered
Whether Hughes was incompetent when he conveyed the deed Mental illness and medication impaired his capacity to transfer property Evidence (attorney testimony, conduct) shows he understood the transaction Court: Conflicting evidence; may not reweigh; trial court did not clearly err — Hughes competent
Whether McKibben must reimburse Hughes for withdrawals/repairs and correct judgment amount Withdrawals and repairs were taken from Hughes’s funds; seek full reimbursement Withdrawals paid rent/Property bills as landlord; repairs paid from her truck sale, not Hughes’s funds Court: No landlord-tenant relationship; account funds deemed Hughes’s; trial court correctly found liability for checks and repairs; appellate court adjusted rent total and remanded to enter judgment of $15,679.55

Key Cases Cited

  • Barkwill v. Cornelia H. Barkwill Revocable Trust, 902 N.E.2d 836 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (distinguishing when confidential relationship arises as a matter of law versus fact)
  • Mullen v. Cogdell, 643 N.E.2d 390 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (elements of constructive fraud)
  • Kalwitz v. Estate of Kalwitz, 822 N.E.2d 274 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (constructive fraud and confidential relationship analysis)
  • Callaway v. Callaway, 932 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (confidential relationships in fact and law)
  • Nichols v. Estate of Tyler, 910 N.E.2d 221 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (standard for mental capacity to convey real property)
  • Turner v. Freed, 792 N.E.2d 947 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (cohabitation claims: express or equitable remedies like unjust enrichment)
  • Dickes v. Felger, 981 N.E.2d 559 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (waiver for failure to develop argument or cite authority)
  • Foster v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Warrick Cnty., 647 N.E.2d 1147 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995) (appellate courts do not reweigh evidence or judge credibility)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Eunice McKibben v. Jeff Hughes, b/n/f Joyce Hughes
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 19, 2014
Citation: 23 N.E.3d 819
Docket Number: 34A02-1311-PL-988
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.