Eugene Brown v. Kenneth McKee
460 F. App'x 567
6th Cir.2012Background
- Petitioner Eugene Brown was convicted of first-degree felony murder and felony firearm in Detroit, 1999, and sentenced to life without parole plus two years.
- Petitioner challenged ineffective assistance of trial counsel on appeal; sought remand for factual development; Michigan Court of Appeals denied both requests.
- Petitioner sought leave to appeal to Michigan Supreme Court, which was denied; federal habeas petition followed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
- District court denied relief on both ineffective-assistance and due-process grounds but granted a certificate of appealability on ineffective assistance related to competency/insanity issues.
- Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed; Petitioner asserted trial counsel failed to investigate competency to stand trial, waiver of Miranda rights, and insanity defense, and presented no defense or witnesses.
- Court applied AEDPA deference; affirmed district court, concluding no unreasonable application of Strickland and no prejudice established.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ineffective assistance for failure to investigate competency/insanity | Brown | Williams | Not unreasonable; relief denied |
| Prejudice showing under Strickland | Brown | Williams | No substantial likelihood of different outcome |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (establishes standard for ineffective assistance)
- Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (U.S. 2000) (unreasonableness of application under AEDPA analysis)
- Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770 (U.S. 2011) (highly deferential review under §2254(d))
- Pinholster v. Ayers, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (U.S. 2011) (AEDPA review limited to state-court record)
- Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (U.S. 2011) (same AEDPA framework for evidentiary record)
- Landrum v. Mitchell, 625 F.3d 905 (6th Cir. 2010) (lower-court interpretations of Supreme Court precedent)
