History
  • No items yet
midpage
Estate of Petter v. Commissioner
653 F.3d 1012
9th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Taxpayer transferred PFLLC units to two trusts and paired gifts with transfers to two charitable foundations via defined-value dollar formula and reallocation clauses.
  • Gifts occurred March 22, 2002; sales occurred March 25, 2002; trusts issued 20-year notes in consideration.
  • Moss Adams appraised unit value at $536.20; distributions to foundations based on that value.
  • IRS later determined units valued at $794.39 per unit, creating underreporting of gifts and adding gifts beyond exemption plus recapture of charitable deduction.
  • Tax Court allowed a charitable deduction for the value of the additional units; IRS argued the additions were conditioned on an audit (a precedent event).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether additional charitable deduction is allowed Petter Commissioner Yes; deduction permitted for additional units
Whether reallocation/dollar formula clauses create a condition precedent Petter Commissioner No; not a condition precedent
Definition of value 'as finally determined for federal gift tax purposes' Petter Commissioner FMV-based; not restricted to return value
Relation of Treasury Regulation 25.2522(c)-3(b)(1) to this case Petter Commissioner Regulation does not bar the deduction

Key Cases Cited

  • Estate of Christiansen v. Comm'r, 586 F.3d 1061 (8th Cir. 2009) (regulation interpretation similar to §25.2522(c)-3(b)(1))
  • Humes v. United States, 276 U.S. 487 (Court (1928)) (donor deduction rules when value contingent on future event)
  • Comm'r v. Estate Sternberger, 348 U.S. 187 (Supreme Court (1955)) (deduction denied where bequest contingent on future event)
  • United States v. Procter, 142 F.2d 824 (4th Cir. 1944) (public policy arguments in charitable deductions context)
  • Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Research v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 704 (Supreme Court (2011)) (court invites regulation amendment for these consequences)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Estate of Petter v. Commissioner
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 4, 2011
Citation: 653 F.3d 1012
Docket Number: 10-71854
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.