History
  • No items yet
midpage
Estate of C.A. v. Castro
547 F. App'x 621
5th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • C.A., a high school senior in HISD, drowned in the school pool during a buoyancy-project physics class in 2008.
  • The project taught buoyancy by building cardboard boats; students were instructed to test in the shallow end but remained in the pool after testing during cleanup.
  • The swimming coach left to supervise other activities; Coronado may have given permission for cleanup, a disputed fact.
  • Students engaged in horseplay in the deep end, while C.A. sank unnoticed until later discovered by others.
  • Plaintiffs alleged awareness of DANGER and prior warnings from parents about C.A.’s inability to swim, but the district court granted summary judgment based on qualified immunity and lack of state-created danger viability.
  • The Fifth Circuit affirmed, addressing both individual-qualified-immunity claims and HISD’s potential liability under a state-created danger theory.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether defendants violated a clearly established right to life. Agwuokes claim defendants’ deliberate indifference caused death. No cognizable constitutional violation or clearly established right. No constitutional violation identified; right not clearly established.
Whether Castro and Coronado are entitled to qualified immunity. Defendants planned/approved dangerous curriculum creating risk. Right not clearly established; actions not on notice of violation. Qualified immunity applies to Castro and Coronado.
Whether the district can be liable under the state-created danger theory. State-created danger should be adopted and applied. Circuit has refused to adopt; insufficient to show a known victim. Court declines to adopt state-created danger theory; no liability for HISD.

Key Cases Cited

  • DeShaney v. Winnebago Cnty. Dept. of Soc. Servs., 489 U.S. 189 (U.S. 1989) (state not obligated to protect individuals from private harm)
  • Covington County Sch. Dist. ex rel. Keys v. Covington, 675 F.3d 865 (5th Cir. 2012) (state-created danger not adopted here; known-victim requirement)
  • Rios v. City of Del Rio, 444 F.3d 417 (5th Cir. 2006) (state-created danger framework; requires a known victim)
  • Saenz v. Heldenfels Bros., Inc., 183 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 1999) (state-created danger inapplicable where no known victim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Estate of C.A. v. Castro
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 25, 2013
Citation: 547 F. App'x 621
Docket Number: No. 13-20057
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.