History
  • No items yet
midpage
104 So. 3d 1111
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • E/C challenged a Judge of Compensation Claims award of a $2000 advance to Deborah Kuhn under §440.20(12).
  • Kuhn, a Delta flight attendant for 25 years, injured her shoulder on Oct 26, 2006; reached MMI with 5% impairment in 2007 and continued working.
  • On July 22, 2011 Kuhn filed a petition seeking only a $2000 advance, with no other pending benefit claims or medical benefits sought.
  • Kuhn testified the cushion would be helpful for unexpected bills, acknowledging no imminent need and that any extra money would be in her interest.
  • JCC awarded the $2000 advance, relying on Lopez v. Allied Aerofoam/Specialty Risk Services, and found the advance in Kuhn's best interest.
  • Court reversed, holding that a $2000 cushion, without nexus to medical or workers’ compensation needs, is not sufficiently connected to the purpose of 440.20(12)(c)(2).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an advance up to $2000 may be awarded based solely on the claimant's interest Kuhn: cushion serves her interest; Lopez allows automatic award up to 2000. E/C: no automatic entitlement; must have nexus to benefits or medical care. No; not sufficient nexus, requires related interests; reverse.
What nexus or criteria justify up to $2000 under §440.20(12)(c)(2) Kuhn contends broad discretion to award if in claimant's best interest. E/C argues only requires interest; Lopez controls outcome. Interest alone is insufficient; must relate to medical/claims context.
Whether Lopez should control limitations on advances under subsection (c)(2) Lopez supported automatic up to 2000 without full nexus limits. Lopez does not foreclose nexus limits; needs contextual connection. Lopez not controlling for this broader nexus requirement; Court reaffirmed limits.

Key Cases Cited

  • Lopez v. Allied Aerofoam/Specialty Risk Services, 48 So.3d 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (addresses automatic awards up to $2000 under 440.20(12)(c)(2))
  • Court of Flags v. Outland, 382 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (advances require nexus to workers' compensation claims)
  • Worthy v. Jimmie Crowder Excavating, 100 So.3d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (discretion to award is present but bounded by statute)
  • Pierre v. R & S Assembly, Inc., 31 So.3d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (abuse of discretion standard; reviewing findings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: ESIS/Ace American Insurance Co. v. Kuhn
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 13, 2012
Citations: 104 So. 3d 1111; 2012 WL 5477109; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19843; No. 1D12-1726
Docket Number: No. 1D12-1726
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    ESIS/Ace American Insurance Co. v. Kuhn, 104 So. 3d 1111