History
  • No items yet
midpage
221 N.C. App. 422
N.C. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff C. Richard Epes, M.D. signed a Guaranty Agreement to back a lease between Primax and CRC Management.
  • Primax later assigned its lease rights to PMC, then PMC assigned to Defendants (including the Guaranty).
  • CRC sold assets to Fuddruckers Inc., and the lease was assigned to Fuddruckers-related entities.
  • Plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action in 2010 seeking to avoid ongoing duties under the Guaranty.
  • Defendants moved for summary judgment in January 2011; the trial court granted it in February 2011.
  • Plaintiff moved for a new trial or relief from judgment under Rules 59 and 60; both motions were denied in August 2011.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Fuddruckers defaulted under the lease. Epes contends no default because bankruptcy can stay defaults for 60 days. Defendants show a bankruptcy filing constitutes an Event of Default under the lease. Yes; Fuddruckers defaulted; bankruptcy stay does not negate default.
Whether the guaranty remains in effect after assignment to Fuddruckers. Assignment/continuation may be ambiguous and construed against Defendants. Clear language shows guaranty continues in full force despite assignment to Fuddruckers. Yes; assignment and guaranty language unambiguously preserve guarantor liability.
Whether Plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(3) fraud claim warranted relief from judgment. Defendants fraudulently asserted default to obtain judgment. Default findings are supported; fraud claim is unsupported. No abuse of discretion; fraud claim insufficient to warrant relief.

Key Cases Cited

  • Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc., 362 N.C. 93 (2008) (findings of fact reviewed for substantial evidence; de novo review of conclusions)
  • Jennings Communications Corp. v. PCG of the Golden Strand, Inc., 126 N.C. App. 637 (1997) (guaranty of payment absolute and unconditional; construction governs liability)
  • Carolina Place Joint Venture v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 145 N.C. App. 696 (2001) (ambiguous contract terms susceptible to multiple constructions require factual dispute resolution)
  • Credit Alliance Corp. v. Williams, 851 F.2d 119 (4th Cir. 1988) (automatic bankruptcy stay does not bar actions against guarantors)
  • Davis v. Davis, 360 N.C. 518 (2006) (standard of review for Rule 60(b) motion is abuse of discretion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Epes v. B.E. Waterhouse, LLC
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 19, 2012
Citations: 221 N.C. App. 422; 728 S.E.2d 390; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 761; 2012 WL 2285164; No. COA11-1528
Docket Number: No. COA11-1528
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    Epes v. B.E. Waterhouse, LLC, 221 N.C. App. 422