Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. MK Weeden Construction, Inc.
1:24-cv-00112
D. Mont.May 20, 2025Background
- Employers Mutual Casualty Company (EMC) sued several Montana-based corporate and individual defendants for issues related to indemnity obligations under a General Application and Agreement of Indemnity (GAI) for surety bonds.
- EMC and all defendants except Monte K. Weeden reached a settlement; proceedings as to Mr. Weeden were stayed due to his Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
- The Court initially granted EMC's motion for attorneys' fees and costs, based on a stipulation requiring an "unopposed" motion, awarding $144,968.50 in total.
- Defendants moved to amend the judgment, objecting to $1,991 in attorneys’ fees allegedly incurred solely during Mr. Weeden’s bankruptcy proceeding and arguing that the “unopposed” motion was misrepresented.
- Defendants also sought $1,350 in fees for filing the motion to amend, claiming EMC misrepresented the status of conferral in the fees motion title and filings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff’s Argument | Defendant’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether EMC’s fees motion was improperly titled “unopposed” | EMC followed the order and settlement agreement by filing as “unopposed” | EMC misrepresented the status; Defendants hadn’t seen necessary billing records | Court found misrepresentation; error warranted amending judgment |
| Whether $1,991 in fees from the bankruptcy Adversary Proceeding are recoverable now | EMC entitled under GAI and relevant law to recover Adversary Proceeding fees now | Fees not recoverable until a prevailing party is determined in the Adversary Proceeding | Fees not recoverable now; may only be recovered after prevailing party is determined |
| Whether Defendants are entitled to $1,350 for motion to amend | No basis for Defendants to recover such fees | Defendants incurred costs due to EMC’s alleged misrepresentation | No legal grounds for awarding these fees; request denied |
| Timing of fee recovery under the GAI and Montana law | EMC entitled to immediate recovery under contract and law | Fee recovery requires determination of a prevailing party per Montana reciprocal fee statute | Fees for unresolved proceedings may not be awarded until resolution and a party prevails |
Key Cases Cited
- Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 549 U.S. 443 (2007) (a creditor is not precluded from seeking contract-based attorneys’ fees incurred during bankruptcy, but state law governs their recovery and timing)
- Turner v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 338 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2003) (sets standard for amending judgments under Rule 59(e))
