History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elizabeth Blanchard v. Nathan A. Mize
186 So. 3d 403
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Elizabeth Blanchard purchased a house in 2003 and secured it with a deed of trust; she later defaulted on payments beginning in 2008.
  • The deed of trust required written notice to borrower before acceleration and notice if lender elected to sell; Section 15 set notice by first-class mail to the property address unless borrower designated otherwise.
  • The deed of trust was assigned to U.S. Bank and a substituted trustee (Morris & Associates attorney Emily Courteau) in 2009; a notice of sale was posted in the courthouse and published in the local paper in June 2010.
  • A substituted trustee’s deed conveyed the property to U.S. Bank after a July 9, 2010 foreclosure; the property was sold to defendant Nathan Mize on February 7, 2011 for $30,000.
  • Blanchard sued for wrongful/illegal/ fraudulent foreclosure, breach of contract, and torts, and sought to set aside the foreclosure; Mize moved for summary judgment asserting he is a bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
  • The trial court granted Mize’s summary-judgment motion, finding no genuine dispute of material fact on notice and that Mize was a bona fide purchaser; Blanchard appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Blanchard received contractually required notice of acceleration before foreclosure Blanchard: she did not receive the written acceleration notice required by the deed of trust, so foreclosure/sale were void Mize: foreclosure complied with statutory posting/publishing; Blanchard offered no sworn proof disputing facts or that contractual notice was given Court: Blanchard failed to produce sworn evidence creating a genuine issue; absence of proof meant issue resolved for defendant
Whether purchaser (Mize) is entitled to bona fide purchaser defense Blanchard: if foreclosure/sale were void due to lack of notice, bona fide purchaser defense unavailable Mize: he purchased for valuable consideration without notice and submitted a sworn affidavit so defense applies Court: Mize proved purchase without notice by affidavit; Blanchard offered no sworn contradictory evidence, so bona fide purchaser defense applies

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Admin. of Estate of May, 32 So. 3d 1227 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010) (summary-judgment standard and requirement that nonmoving party present specific factual proof)
  • Anglado v. Leaf River Forest Prods., 716 So. 2d 543 (Miss. 1998) (Mississippi standard for de novo review of summary judgment cited)
  • EB Inc. v. Allen, 722 So. 2d 555 (Miss. 1998) (statutory posting and publication suffice for non-judicial foreclosure; additional notice obligations derive from the deed of trust)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Elizabeth Blanchard v. Nathan A. Mize
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Feb 16, 2016
Citation: 186 So. 3d 403
Docket Number: 2014-CA-01703-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.