Elizabeth Blanchard v. Nathan A. Mize
186 So. 3d 403
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2016Background
- Elizabeth Blanchard purchased a house in 2003 and secured it with a deed of trust; she later defaulted on payments beginning in 2008.
- The deed of trust required written notice to borrower before acceleration and notice if lender elected to sell; Section 15 set notice by first-class mail to the property address unless borrower designated otherwise.
- The deed of trust was assigned to U.S. Bank and a substituted trustee (Morris & Associates attorney Emily Courteau) in 2009; a notice of sale was posted in the courthouse and published in the local paper in June 2010.
- A substituted trustee’s deed conveyed the property to U.S. Bank after a July 9, 2010 foreclosure; the property was sold to defendant Nathan Mize on February 7, 2011 for $30,000.
- Blanchard sued for wrongful/illegal/ fraudulent foreclosure, breach of contract, and torts, and sought to set aside the foreclosure; Mize moved for summary judgment asserting he is a bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
- The trial court granted Mize’s summary-judgment motion, finding no genuine dispute of material fact on notice and that Mize was a bona fide purchaser; Blanchard appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Blanchard received contractually required notice of acceleration before foreclosure | Blanchard: she did not receive the written acceleration notice required by the deed of trust, so foreclosure/sale were void | Mize: foreclosure complied with statutory posting/publishing; Blanchard offered no sworn proof disputing facts or that contractual notice was given | Court: Blanchard failed to produce sworn evidence creating a genuine issue; absence of proof meant issue resolved for defendant |
| Whether purchaser (Mize) is entitled to bona fide purchaser defense | Blanchard: if foreclosure/sale were void due to lack of notice, bona fide purchaser defense unavailable | Mize: he purchased for valuable consideration without notice and submitted a sworn affidavit so defense applies | Court: Mize proved purchase without notice by affidavit; Blanchard offered no sworn contradictory evidence, so bona fide purchaser defense applies |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Admin. of Estate of May, 32 So. 3d 1227 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010) (summary-judgment standard and requirement that nonmoving party present specific factual proof)
- Anglado v. Leaf River Forest Prods., 716 So. 2d 543 (Miss. 1998) (Mississippi standard for de novo review of summary judgment cited)
- EB Inc. v. Allen, 722 So. 2d 555 (Miss. 1998) (statutory posting and publication suffice for non-judicial foreclosure; additional notice obligations derive from the deed of trust)
