History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elgin v. Swann
315 Ga. App. 809
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Elgin appeals a six-month stalking protective order issued under OCGA § 16-5-94(d) on August 9, 2011, which expired February 9, 2012.
  • Swann alleged threatening and harassing conduct by Elgin beginning July 2011, including July 17 loud confrontation and threats.
  • On August 4, 2011, Elgin allegedly swerved toward Swann's stepdaughter's car and later photographed the Swanns from her car.
  • Elgin had moved out of the neighborhood by the August 9, 2011 hearing.
  • The trial court applied the appropriate evidentiary standard and issued the protective order after a hearing.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that the issues are not moot, the standard was correctly applied, and the order was supported by the evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Mootness of the appeal Elgin argues the issues are moot because the order expired. Swann contends issues are capable of repetition and not reviewable due to short duration. Not moot; issues capable of repetition and likely to evade review.
Burden of proof for the protective order Elgin asserts the trial court did not apply the proper burden. Swann argues the court correctly used the preponderance standard. Correct application of the preponderance of the evidence standard.
Sufficiency of the evidence Elgin contends evidence was insufficient to support the order. Swann asserts the evidence showed stalking elements and a pattern of harassing and intimidating conduct. Evidence supported a finding of stalking and reasonable fear, justifying the order.

Key Cases Cited

  • Garnsey v. Buice, 306 Ga. App. 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010) (defines elements and standards for stalking protective orders)
  • Birchby v. Carboy, 311 Ga. App. 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011) (issues not moot where repetition and review are possible)
  • Collins v. Lombard Corp., 270 Ga. 120 (Ga. 1998) (mootness and review standards in protective orders)
  • DeLouis v. Sheppard, 277 Ga. App. 768 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (appellate review of evidence in stalking protective orders; credibility not weighed)
  • Johnson v. Smith, 260 Ga. App. 722 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003) (evidence of surveillance and intimidation supported order)
  • Daker v. Williams, 279 Ga. 782 (Ga. 2005) (two related stalking incidents can establish a pattern)
  • Anderson v. Mergenhagen, 283 Ga. App. 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007) (trial court's determinations on protective orders defer to its assessments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Elgin v. Swann
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 8, 2012
Citation: 315 Ga. App. 809
Docket Number: A12A0284
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.