History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ekhlassi v. Nat'l Lloyds Ins. Co.
295 F. Supp. 3d 750
S.D. Tex.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • May 23–25, 2015 flood damaged Ekhlassi’s home; he submitted a flood claim under a NFIP Standard Flood Insurance Policy issued by National Lloyds.
  • National Lloyds' adjuster inspected and estimated $3,768.15 in covered flood-cleanup damages but found other claimed damage excluded.
  • October 6, 2015 letter from National Lloyds identified itself as a denial letter, stated it would pay $3,768.25, and told Ekhlassi he had 240 days from loss to submit a sworn proof of loss.
  • Ekhlassi submitted a sworn proof of loss on December 28, 2015 claiming $274,940.05.
  • January 11, 2016 letter again rejected the larger proof of loss and referenced the October 6 denial letter as the basis for denial.
  • Ekhlassi filed suit on January 11, 2017 against National Lloyds (and Auto Club); National Lloyds moved for summary judgment arguing the one-year limitations period began with the October 6, 2015 denial letter.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
When did the SFIP one-year limitations period begin to run? January 11, 2016 letter gave notice of denial, so suit filed Jan 11, 2017 is timely. October 6, 2015 letter was the written denial that triggered the one-year limitations period; suit filed Jan 11, 2017 is untimely. The October 6, 2015 letter was a denial and triggered the one-year limitations period; suit is time-barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Trent v. Wade, 776 F.3d 368 (5th Cir. 2015) (summary judgment standard).
  • Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. Haydel Enters., Inc., 783 F.3d 527 (5th Cir. 2015) (standard for genuine dispute of material fact).
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986) (summary judgment framework).
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (movant may show absence of evidence to meet Rule 56 burden).
  • Marseilles Homeowners Condo. Ass'n v. Fid. Nat'l Ins. Co., 542 F.3d 1053 (5th Cir. 2008) (SFIP conditions precedent, including sworn proof of loss, are strictly enforced).
  • Qader v. FEMA, 543 F. Supp. 2d 558 (E.D. La. 2008) (discussing FEMA waivers and the effect on proof-of-loss and timing for filing suit)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ekhlassi v. Nat'l Lloyds Ins. Co.
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Texas
Date Published: Jan 9, 2018
Citation: 295 F. Supp. 3d 750
Docket Number: CIVIL ACTION NO. H–17–1257
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Tex.