History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edward Hines Sigler v. Commonwealth of Virginia
61 Va. App. 674
| Va. Ct. App. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Edward Hines Sigler pled guilty to burglary and five counts of grand larceny.
  • The trial court ordered restitution totaling $2,000 for the loss alleged by the victim, L.F.
  • At sentencing, the Commonwealth presented a loss value based on items not recovered and a list of stolen items.
  • The list of items and related loss were not entered into evidence but were used to support the restitution amount.
  • Appellant contends the loss amount is speculative and not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, challenging the restitution figure.
  • Court affirms restitution as supported by the record and notes sentencing courts may consider hearsay with reliability indicia in setting restitution

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the restitution amount was proven by a preponderance of the evidence Sigler contends L.F.'s loss is speculative Sigler asserts insufficient evidence to establish exact loss amount Restitution upheld; evidence supports amount at preponderance of the evidence
Whether L.F.'s unsworn loss list is a reliable basis for restitution Sigler argues the list is inadmissible hearsay Sigler argues list bears reliability and is admissible for restitution Court accepts hearsay with indicia of reliability; list supported by preponderance of the evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • Smith v. Commonwealth, 52 Va. App. 26, 660 S.E.2d 691 (2008) (victim may opine on value; hearsay allowed with reliability for restitution)
  • McCullough v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 811, 568 S.E.2d 449 (2002) (restitution evidence may be based on various sources if reliable)
  • Deal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 157, 421 S.E.2d 897 (1992) (sentencing discretion in ordering restitution)
  • Grattan v. Commonwealth, 278 Va. 602, 685 S.E.2d 634 (2009) (abuse of discretion only if unreasonable under the circumstances)
  • Alger v. Commonwealth, 19 Va. App. 252, 450 S.E.2d 765 (1994) (allowing hearsay in sentencing with reliability)
  • Moses v. Commonwealth, 27 Va. App. 293, 498 S.E.2d 451 (1998) (informational reliability of hearsay in sentencing)
  • McClain v. Commonwealth, 189 Va. 847, 55 S.E.2d 49 (1949) (historical note on sentencing discretion and evidence sources)
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Charity, 255 Va. 55, 496 S.E.2d 430 (1998) (proof of loss; insurer investigations; good faith)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Edward Hines Sigler v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 2, 2013
Citation: 61 Va. App. 674
Docket Number: 0822121
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.