History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edmond v. State
951 N.E.2d 585
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Edmond was stopped for a traffic violation after failing to stop at a sign; he had only a learner's permit and no licensed driver with him.
  • Officer Drennan smelled burnt marijuana from Edmond and the vehicle, and from Edmond's breath, creating probable cause to search the vehicle.
  • Edmond was asked to exit the vehicle; a pat-down search occurred and a baggie of marijuana was removed from Edmond's pocket.
  • Edmond was charged with possession of marijuana as a class A misdemeanor; he moved to suppress the pat-down evidence at a bench trial.
  • The trial court denied suppression and Edmond was convicted; on appeal, the issue is whether the search violated Fourth Amendment or Article 1, Section 11.
  • The court held the search was valid as a search incident to arrest based on probable cause, and affirmed Edmond’s conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Fourth Amendment—validity of search incident to arrest Edmond argues the pat-down/search of his person was unlawful under the Fourth Amendment. State contends there was probable cause to arrest Edmond and the search was incident to arrest. Search was permissible as incident to arrest.
Probable cause to arrest based on odor of marijuana Odor alone cannot justify arrest or search of a person. Odor of burnt marijuana on Edmond’s breath plus vehicle provided probable cause to arrest Edmond for possession. There was probable cause to arrest Edmond, justifying a search incident to arrest.
Article 1, Section 11—Indiana Constitution Search of Edmond’s person violated Indiana’s search and seizure protections. Indiana Constitution is satisfied under totality-of-circumstances; intrusion minimal and needs justified by arrest. No violation under Article 1, Section 11; evidence admissible.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hawkins v. State, 766 N.E.2d 749 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002) (odor of burnt marijuana in vehicle establishes probable cause to search)
  • Sebastian v. State, 726 N.E.2d 827 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (pat-downs related to vehicle searches after odor of marijuana; probable cause to arrest and search incident to arrest)
  • Edwards v. State, 759 N.E.2d 626 (Ind. 2001) (searches incident to a lawful recent arrest)
  • Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) (probable cause/ reasonable suspicion standard; de novo review on ultimate determinations)
  • Ratliff v. State, 770 N.E.2d 807 (Ind. 2002) (exception to the warrant requirement; burden on State)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Edmond v. State
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 14, 2011
Citation: 951 N.E.2d 585
Docket Number: 49A04-1012-CR-756
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.