Eckstein v. Colian
2012 Ohio 4038
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Appellant Colian appeals a trial court order issuing a five-year domestic violence civil protection order (DVCPO) against him after a March 27, 2011 incident with Kathryn Eckstein.
- Kathryn Eckstein and Colian were divorced in 2008 and share two minor children; Colian came to Eckstein's home to exchange the children.
- During the exchange, Colian, accompanied by his fiancée Mandy Grimes, argued with Eckstein; Eckstein was punched in the head.
- Eckstein required hospital treatment and was diagnosed with a concussion, with ongoing headaches and neck pain.
- Witnesses included Eckstein’s parents Barbara and Michael Eckstein and Grimes; the witnesses testified to the confrontation and Eckstein’s fear of Colian.
- The magistrate found Colian not credible and granted the DVCPO based on credible evidence of domestic violence and fear of further harm.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the DVCPO was warranted by the evidence. | Eckstein shows domestic violence and danger to family. | Colian denies violence and argues weight of evidence undermines the order. | Yes; the DVCPO affirmed based on competent, credible evidence. |
Key Cases Cited
- Rosine v. Rosine, 7th Dist. No. 09-MA-18, 2010-Ohio-613 (Ohio 2010) (appellate review gives deference to trial court credibility findings)
- C.E. Morris v. Foley Construction Co., 54 Ohio St.2d 279, 376 N.E.2d 578 (1978) (Ohio 1978) (preponderance standard for protective orders)
- State v. Stumpf, 32 Ohio St.3d 95, 512 N.E.2d 598 (1987) (Ohio 1987) (definition of preponderance of the evidence)
- Felton v. Felton, 79 Ohio St.3d 34, 679 N.E.2d 672 (1997) (Ohio 1997) (requires showing of danger of domestic violence by preponderance of the evidence)
- State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 739 N.E.2d 749 (2001) (Ohio 2001) (circumstantial evidence carries probative value equal to direct evidence)
- Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469, 120 N.E.2d 118 (1954) (Ohio 1954) (emphasizes weight of witness credibility in resolving facts)
