History
  • No items yet
midpage
56 F. Supp. 3d 1110
N.D. Cal.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Aspen fire in Sierra National Forest burned ~22,300 acres in Eastern District of California in July 2013.
  • American fire burned ~22–28,000 acres in Tahoe National Forest in Eastern District in August 2013.
  • Tahoe NP Forest public NEPA process for Big Hope Project; DN/FONSI signed June 26, 2014 by Quinn; DN/FONSI prepared in Placer/Nevada Counties (ED Cal).
  • Sierra National Forest NEPA process for Aspen Project; DN/FONSI signed June 27, 2014 by Gould; EA prepared in Fresno County (ED Cal).
  • Plaintiffs Earth Island Institute and Center for Biological Diversity allege NEPA/NFMA/APA violations; seek declarations, injunction, fees, and costs.
  • Defendants move to sever claims and transfer venue to the Eastern District of California; Court grants transfer and denies severance without prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Proper venue under § 1391(e)(1)(C)? Plaintiffs reside in ED Cal; action does not involve real property. Action involves land area; real property concept may apply. Venue permissible in this district under § 1391(e)(1)(C).
Discretionary transfer under § 1404(a)? Forum should remain due to plaintiff connections and local interest. Transfer to ED Cal is warranted given events, parties, and local impacts. Transfer to the Eastern District of California granted.
Sever motion viability? Severing would aid case management; each project merits separate consideration. Severance prudent for transferee court to manage case. Sever motion denied without prejudice to renew in transferee court.

Key Cases Cited

  • NRDC v. TVA, 340 F. Supp. 400 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) (real property focus in venue analysis; expands 1391(e)(1)(C) interpretation)
  • Ferguson v. Lieurance, 565 F. Supp. 1013 (D. Nev. 1983) (discusses real property interest in § 1391(e)(4) predecessor)
  • CBD v. USBLM, 2009 WL 1025606 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (venue in land-related federal challenges (noting § 1391(e) scope))
  • Envtl. Def. Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of U.S. Army, 325 F. Supp. 728 (E.D. Ark. 1971) (interpretation of venue liberalization in § 1391(e))
  • Piper Aircraft v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235 (1981) (forum choice and local interest in § 1404(a) analysis)
  • Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 (1964) (basis for transfer decisions and appellate deference)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Earth Island Institute v. Quinn
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Jul 21, 2014
Citations: 56 F. Supp. 3d 1110; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98915; 2014 WL 3611296; Case No. 14-cv-03101-JST
Docket Number: Case No. 14-cv-03101-JST
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.
Log In
    Earth Island Institute v. Quinn, 56 F. Supp. 3d 1110