History
  • No items yet
midpage
54 A.3d 880
Pa. Super. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Boyfriend appeals a February 29, 2012 order sustaining adoptive mother's preliminary objections and holding he lacks standing to seek custody.
  • Adoptive mother, the children's biological maternal great-aunt, shared physical and legal custody with Great-Grandmother since May 2009.
  • Biological mother consented to adoption in October 2010; adoptive mother filed for involuntary termination of biological father's rights, granted November 2010.
  • Biological mother’s rights were terminated April 18, 2011; custody was awarded to Adoptive Mother on May 25, 2011.
  • Boyfriend filed a custody complaint on July 29, 2011; adoptive mother challenged standing due to lack of relationship and parental obligations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Boyfriend has standing to seek custody after adoption Boyfriend maintains in loco parentis status grants standing despite adoption. Adoptive mother contends §5326 terminates such rights when child is adopted by non-stepparent/non-grandparent. Boyfriend lacks standing; §5326 terminates prior custody rights upon adoption by non-stepparent/non-grandparent.
Scope of §5326 regarding termination of 5324/5325 rights §5326 only extinguishes grandparent/great-grandparent rights, preserving others. §5326 terminates all rights granted under 5324/5325 to anyone other than a stepparent/grandparent/great-grandparent upon adoption. Statutory language terminates all such rights upon adoption by a non-specified adopter; in loco parentis rights are terminated.
Application of statutory construction under 1 Pa.C.S. §1921 to §5326 Language of §5326 is ambiguous and requires broader construction. Plain language should be read to terminate rights broadly upon adoption. Court applied plain language and interpretive principles, aligning with legislative purpose to sever ties on adoption.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Garzone, 34 A.3d 67 (Pa. 2012) (statutory interpretation guidance for §1921(c) and purpose of custody statutes)
  • In re Adoption of R.J.S., 889 A.2d 92 (Pa. Super. 2005) (adoption terminates the child’s ties to prior family under prior law)
  • In re Baby Boy Benjamin, 305 A.2d 360 (Pa. 1973) (longstanding view that adoption severs ties to former family)
  • P.T. v. M.H., 953 A.2d 814 (Pa. Super. 2008) (standard of review in de novo custody matters)
  • Commonwealth v. McCoy, 962 A.2d 1160 (Pa. 2009) (statutory interpretation framework and construction principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: E.T.S. v. S.L.H.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 28, 2012
Citations: 54 A.3d 880; 2012 WL 4466159; 2012 Pa. Super. 207; 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2526
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In
    E.T.S. v. S.L.H., 54 A.3d 880