History
  • No items yet
midpage
813 S.E.2d 916
Va. Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • On Nov. 2, 2014, police attempted a traffic stop of Moore’s vehicle for an unlit rear license plate; Moore fled, jumped from the moving car, and the car struck two parked vehicles.
  • Officers pursued Moore on foot; he was eventually captured after running and falling; at the crash scene Officer Groome arrived as the lone officer and observed a crowd forming.
  • From outside the open driver-side door, Groome saw an uncovered, loaded firearm on the driver’s floorboard, entered the vehicle, unloaded the gun, and secured it in his police vehicle without a warrant or consent.
  • A drug-sniffing dog later alerted to the vehicle’s exterior; a subsequent search yielded only a small suspected marijuana roach.
  • Moore entered an Alford conditional guilty plea but reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the firearm; the trial court denied suppression, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Moore) Defendant's Argument (Commonwealth) Held
Whether the warrantless seizure of the gun violated the Fourth Amendment Seizure was unlawful because officers had no warrant, no demonstrated urgency, no evidence crowd was dangerous, and no showing Groome knew Moore was armed or a felon Exigent circumstances justified taking the gun: loaded firearm in plain view at an unsecured crash scene, driver fled and was at large, crowd forming, lone officer on scene Court held exigent circumstances justified the warrantless seizure; denial of suppression affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (recognizes conditional guilty pleas preserving appellate rights)
  • Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) (vehicle passenger-compartment protective sweep for officer safety)
  • Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (1973) (community-caretaker exception justified warrantless search of vehicle to secure a firearm)
  • Taylor v. Commonwealth, 10 Va. App. 260 (1990) (upheld warrantless seizure of guns in plain view where officers were outnumbered and guns were readily accessible)
  • Verez v. Commonwealth, 230 Va. 405 (1985) (list of exigent-circumstance factors to evaluate warrantless entries)
  • Keeter v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 134 (1981) (courts assess exigency based on officers’ on-scene perceptions)
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) (recognizes vehicle-search exceptions for safety and evidentiary concerns)
  • United States v. Newbourn, 600 F.2d 452 (4th Cir. 1979) (warrantless seizure of unsecured weapons reasonable to prevent public danger)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dwight Delano Moore v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Jun 5, 2018
Citations: 813 S.E.2d 916; 69 Va. App. 30; 0224171
Docket Number: 0224171
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
Log In