Durham v. Butler
89 So. 3d 1023
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.2012Background
- Rebekah Durham appeals a Florida circuit court order denying dismissal of Robert Butler's paternity complaint.
- Mother argues Florida court lacked jurisdiction because a Missouri proceeding had not been resolved.
- Missouri originally issued a 2002 decree for paternity, child support, and visitation; confirmation order followed years later.
- Parties moved to Florida; father filed paternity action in Miami-Dade in June 2011; Missouri proceeding remained pending with an appeal filed in 2011.
- Florida denied the motion to dismiss; court treated the appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition seeking to halt Florida jurisdiction.
- Court held that under UCCJEA, Florida should not exercise jurisdiction while Missouri proceeding is pending.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Florida lacked jurisdiction under UCCJEA because a related Missouri proceeding is pending | Durham: Missouri case pending bars Florida jurisdiction | Butler: Florida may exercise jurisdiction to modify if appropriate | Florida court should not exercise jurisdiction; writ of prohibition granted |
| Whether a writ of prohibition is an appropriate remedy | Prohibition is the proper remedy to prevent improper jurisdiction | Remedy may be unnecessary if jurisdiction is proper | Writ of prohibition is appropriate in this jurisdictional context |
Key Cases Cited
- Karam v. Karam, 6 So.3d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (UCCJEA controls custody disputes; substantial conformity bars Florida jurisdiction)
- London v. London, 32 So.3d 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (home-state and jurisdictional issues; maintains limitations on Florida modification)
- Custody of a Minor, 392 Mass. 728 (Mass. 1984) (simultaneous proceedings doctrine; pending appeal precludes jurisdiction)
- In re Custody of Rector, 565 P.2d 950 (Colo. App. 1977) (pending appeal precludes concurrent proceedings under UCCJA framework)
- Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1992) (prohibition as remedy when court acts beyond jurisdiction)
