History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durand v. United States Department of Labor
662 F.3d 1106
9th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • FECA provides disability benefits to federal employees injured on the job; if a third party is liable, the Secretary may require suit and, upon recovery, the beneficiary must refund FECA benefits received; §8132 allows deduction of costs of suit and a reasonable attorney's fee from the recovery, with a 20% minimum retention and a separate attorney's fee proportionate to the refund; Durand settled with Era Aviation for $2.3 million, triggering a U.S. refund obligation of $881,237.39 after deductions; Durand's litigation costs and a 33.3% attorney fee were negotiated, reducing the refund payable to the United States by a portion of the fee; the dispute centers on whether Durand may also deduct litigation costs from the refund itself rather than only from the gross recovery.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §8132 allows deducting litigation costs from the refund amount. Durand argues costs are deductible from the refund. Secretary argues costs are deductible only from gross recovery, not the refund. Costs not deductible from the refund; deduct only from gross recovery.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs., Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009) (statutory interpretation principle; ordinary meaning controls)
  • Arizona State Bd. for Charter Schools v. U.S. Dep't of Educ., 464 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2006) (statutory interpretation framework on text and purpose)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Durand v. United States Department of Labor
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 17, 2011
Citation: 662 F.3d 1106
Docket Number: 10-36184
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.