History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunn v. State
308 Ga. App. 103
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Dunn was convicted in Fulton County of statutory rape, solicitation of sodomy involving a person under 18, and pandering.
  • Dunn challenged the trial court’s dismissal of a juror and claimed violation of his right to be present at a critical stage.
  • The juror was discharged after a bench conference and a public statement that he had slept and had body odor concerns, with an alternate juror substituted.
  • The dismissal occurred without Dunn or his counsel being informed of the reasons or asked for input on the decision.
  • The court acknowledged concerns about ex parte communications and a lack of a personal, on-record basis for the juror’s dismissal.
  • The Georgia Court of Appeals held that the juror dismissal was an abuse of discretion and reversed, remanding for a new trial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the juror’s dismissal an abuse of discretion? Dunn argues dismissal without in-person hearing or proper factual basis violated OCGA § 15-12-172. State contends the court validly replaced an potentially impaired juror to preserve trial integrity. Yes; abuse of discretion; remanded for new trial.
Did Dunn waive objection to the dismissal? Dunn did not knowingly waive his presence or rights; counsel’s waiver cannot bind him. Defense counsel’s statement of no objection constituted waiver of Dunn's objection. No; Dunn did not knowingly acquiesce; reversal and new trial remand.
Are remaining arguments moot after reversal on the juror-dismissal issue? If juror dismissal is improper, other issues may be moot on retrial. Some issues may survive for consideration on retrial. Moot; other issues are subsumed by reversal and remand.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brooks v. State, 281 Ga. 14, 635 S.E.2d 723 (2006) (2006) (juror replacement requires sound legal basis)
  • Payne v. State, 290 Ga.App. 589, 660 S.E.2d 405 (2008) (2008) (ex parte communications cautioned in jury issues)
  • Scott v. State, 219 Ga.App. 798, 466 S.E.2d 678 (1996) (1996) (premature juror dismissal without proper inquiry; new trial)
  • Sammons v. State, 279 Ga. 386, 612 S.E.2d 785 (2005) (2005) ( waivers require informed consent on record)
  • Russell v. State, 236 Ga.App. 645, 512 S.E.2d 913 (1998) (1998) (acquiescence requires knowledge of right and waiver)
  • Smith v. State, 284 Ga. 17, 663 S.E.2d 142 (2008) (2008) (court’s handling of sleeping juror; remedial actions)
  • Herring v. State, 224 Ga.App. 809, 481 S.E.2d 842 (1997) (1997) (need for sound basis and careful inquiry in juror issues)
  • Peterson v. State, 284 Ga. 275, 663 S.E.2d 164 (2008) (2008) (presence rights and record demands in jury matters)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dunn v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 24, 2011
Citation: 308 Ga. App. 103
Docket Number: A10A2233
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.