Dunbar v. State
2012 Ohio 707
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Dunbar struck his live-in fiancée and was charged with domestic violence; he pled no contest and was sentenced to 180 days in jail in municipal court.
- Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Dunbar on abduction and domestic violence arising from the same incident; he pleaded guilty to one count of abduction in a plea agreement for community control, but the trial court imposed a two-year prison term.
- This court found the plea was entered knowingly but the trial court erred by imposing a prison sentence without allowing a withdrawal, vacating the plea in Dunbar I.
- On remand, a jury convicted Dunbar of abduction; this court reversed for insufficiency of evidence in Dunbar II, and Dunbar was discharged.
- Dunbar filed for a declaratory judgment under R.C. 2743.48(A) to determine wrongful imprisonment; the trial court granted summary judgment for Dunbar, declaring him a wrongfully imprisoned individual.
- The State appeals, arguing the guilty plea precludes recovery and that Dunbar failed to prove innocence by a preponderance; the court ultimately overrules these arguments.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does Dunbar qualify as a wrongfully imprisoned individual despite the prior guilty plea? | Dunbar argues the plea was void and does not bar relief. | State argues the valid guilty plea precludes wrongful imprisonment relief. | Plea void; Dunbar can pursue relief. |
| Did Dunbar prove innocence by a preponderance of the evidence? | Record shows Dunbar’s innocence based on Dunbar II findings. | Record insufficient to prove innocence by preponderance. | Yes; Dunbar proved innocence by a preponderance. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Moore, 165 Ohio App.3d 538 (Ohio Fourth Dist. 2006) (void guilty plea may not bar relief when ineffective counsel or other defects exist)
- Gover v. State, 67 Ohio St.3d 93 (Ohio 1993) (filters out claimants who committed other offenses related to the conviction)
- Walden v. State, 47 Ohio St.3d 47 (Ohio 1989) (wrongful imprisonment requires innocence by preponderance, beyond acquittal)
- Ellis v. State, 64 Ohio St.3d 391 (Ohio 1992) (need more than acquittal to prove wrongful imprisonment)
- Dunbar v. State (Dunbar II), 2010-Ohio-239 (Ohio) (insufficient evidence to support abduction conviction; later relied on for innocence finding)
- Doss v. State, 8th Dist. No. 96452 (2011) (uncontradicted evidence supports 2743.48(A) claim)
- State v. Dunbar, 8th Dist. No. 87317 (2007) (Dunbar I; plea-deviation explanation and voidness of plea when sentence was not properly advised)
- Gover v. State, 84 Ohio St.3d 70 (Ohio 1998) (contextualizes requirement that no further prosecutions can occur for related acts)
