History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dumke v. The City of Chicago
994 N.E.2d 573
Ill. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • FOIA request to Chicago police seeking final report of 2010 police-ops assessment by A.T. Kearney, Civic Consulting Alliance, and McKinsey; mayor Daley publicly discussed the study in a press conference.
  • The city denied disclosure under FOIA section 7(1)(f) as to predecisional records; the Public Access Counselor affirmed the denial.
  • Plaintiff sued for declaratory and injunctive relief to compel production of the report; counts I–II resolved, leaving count III at issue.
  • Trial court granted the city's summary judgment on count III, holding the mayor could not waive the exemption since the head of the public body was the police superintendent.
  • The court reserved ruling on whether mayor’s statements constituted a waiver; this court reverses and holds the mayor waived the exemption by publicly citing and identifying the report.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Who qualifies as the head of the public body to waive FOIA 7(1)(f) exemption Dumke argues mayor can waive City argues only police superintendent can waive Mayor can waive 7(1)(f) exemption
Whether Mayor Daley publicly citing the report waives the exemption Daley’s statements satisfy public citation and identification Statements were not sufficient to identify the report Waiver established by mayor's public citation and identification
Whether in camera review is needed after waiver In camera review appropriate to determine disclosure scope No in camera review; scope limited In camera review not required; entire report should be produced

Key Cases Cited

  • Harwood v. McDonough, 344 Ill. App. 3d 242 (2003) (FOIA 7(1)(f) waiver analysis contrasted with executive summaries)
  • Southern Illinoisian v. Illinois Dept. of Public Health, 218 Ill. 2d 390 (2006) (public policy favoring disclosure; evaluation of citation/identification)
  • Bowie v. Evanston Community Consolidated School Dist. No. 65, 128 Ill. 2d 373 (1989) (FOIA open records policy; interpretation of exemptions)
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 (1975) (federal deliberative-process privilege context; predecisional material)
  • Reynard v. Board of Regents of Regency University System, 292 Ill. App. 3d 968 (1997) (public body; subsidiary public body treated for FOIA purposes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dumke v. The City of Chicago
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jun 28, 2013
Citation: 994 N.E.2d 573
Docket Number: 1-12-1668
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.