History
  • No items yet
midpage
402 P.3d 980
Wyo.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Curtis Drakeford pled no contest to strangulation of a household member and to domestic battery (third or subsequent) after consolidated felony informations; three child-endangerment counts were dismissed.
  • Affidavits described the victim with a bloody face and two separate assaults: Appellant placed hands around her neck in the bathroom (impeding breathing) and later struck her on the head with a beer bottle in the main room.
  • Officers observed finger marks on the victim’s neck and lumps on her head consistent with the two described injuries; Appellant was arrested and charged with both offenses.
  • District court accepted the pleas and imposed concurrent sentences of 2–4 years on each count; Drakeford appealed raising a double jeopardy claim.
  • Drakeford argued domestic battery is a lesser included offense of strangulation and convicting/sentencing on both violates double jeopardy; the State conceded domestic battery is a lesser included offense but argued the convictions arose from separate acts.
  • The court reviewed the unpreserved double jeopardy claim for plain error and analyzed whether the two offenses were based on distinct conduct.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether convicting and sentencing Drakeford for both strangulation and domestic battery violated double jeopardy Drakeford: Domestic battery is a lesser included offense of strangulation; punishing both violates double jeopardy State: Although domestic battery is a lesser included offense, convictions rest on separate acts (strangulation in bathroom; battery with beer bottle in main room) so no double jeopardy No plain-error double jeopardy violation — convictions affirmed because offenses were based on separate, distinct acts

Key Cases Cited

  • Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856 (double jeopardy prohibits multiple punishments for same offense)
  • Nickels v. State, 351 P.3d 288 (Wyo. 2015) (battery is a lesser-included offense of household-member strangulation)
  • Granzer v. State, 239 P.3d 640 (Wyo. 2010) (Blockburger statutory-elements test governs lesser-included analysis)
  • Redding v. State, 371 P.3d 136 (Wyo. 2016) (distinct acts, even seconds apart, are not lesser-included offences of each other)
  • Sam v. State, 401 P.3d 834 (Wyo. 2017) (separate and distinct conduct precludes double jeopardy claim)
  • Baum v. State, 745 P.2d 877 (Wyo. 1987) (same principle that distinct acts are not included offenses)
  • Bowlsby v. State, 302 P.3d 913 (Wyo. 2013) (a second conviction is impermissible punishment under double jeopardy)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Drakeford v. State
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 28, 2017
Citations: 402 P.3d 980; 2017 Wyo. LEXIS 121; 2017 WY 115; S-17-0018
Docket Number: S-17-0018
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
Log In
    Drakeford v. State, 402 P.3d 980