History
  • No items yet
midpage
Downing v. State
2011 WY 113
| Wyo. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • CI worked with DCI to arrange illegal morphine purchase; buy money of $1,800 given to appellant at JC's house with JC and SM present
  • CI was wired; recording quality was poor due to background noise
  • Investigation did not immediately recover buy money or pills due to lack of immediate warrant execution
  • Pretrial discovery sought information on other CI buys; district court ordered Brady/Hensley material production but limited Rule 16/26.2 discovery
  • Trial court sustained defense objection to questioning CI about other buys, citing risk of jury distraction
  • Appellant’s theory: CI sought to con DCI; cross-examination sought to test CI credibility and potential bias

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the district court abused discretion interpreting evidence rules Downing argues exclusion of other buys violated Brady/Hensley and cross-exam rights Downing asserts cross-exam to test CI credibility is essential to defense Conviction reversed; new trial remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • Edwards v. State, 2007 WY 146, 167 P.3d 636 (Wyo.2007) (reversal when evidence central to defense was excluded under 403/404 analogies)
  • Hensley v. State, 2002 WY 96, 48 P.3d 1099 (Wyo.2002) (impeachment/Brady materiality; material evidence requires reversal)
  • Dysthe v. State, 2003 WY 20, 63 P.3d 875 (Wyo.2003) (reversed where cross-examination of credibility denied; significant reliance on witness credibility)
  • Miller v. State, 2006 WY 17, 127 P.3d 793 (Wyo.2006) (limits on cross-examination; confrontation rights may be reasonably restricted)
  • Hannon v. State, 2004 WY 8, 84 P.3d 320 (Wyo.2004) (confrontation right; testing witness reliability through cross-examination)
  • Budig v. State, 2010 WY 1, 222 P.3d 148 (Wyo.2010) (limits on cross-examination; harmless-error framework clarified)
  • Bagley v. Maryland, 473 U.S. 667, 105 S. Ct. 3375 (U.S.1985) (materiality standard for Brady evidence)
  • United States v. DeSoto, 950 F.2d 626 (10th Cir.1991) (limits on cross-examination; balancing of relevance and prejudicial impact)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Downing v. State
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 25, 2011
Citation: 2011 WY 113
Docket Number: S-10-0128
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.