832 F. Supp. 2d 813
S.D. Ohio2011Background
- Plaintiff Terry Douglas sought SSI and DIB challenging the denial for the period Oct 14, 2002–May 6, 2006.
- ALJ found no disability for Oct 14, 2002–Jan 16, 2005 and for Jan 17, 2005–May 6, 2006.
- Magistrate Judge recommended remand for benefits for Jan 17, 2005–May 6, 2006 and affirmed pre-2005 denial.
- District Court adopted Magistrate’s recommendations, overruling objections; judgment entered in part for Defendant and in part for Plaintiff.
- Court remanded for payment of benefits for the Jan 17, 2005–May 6, 2006 period; terminated by the Southern District of Ohio.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether ALJ properly weighed medical opinions | Douglas argues treating Dr. Serio should be controlling | Goeke/agency opinions appropriately weighed | ALJ properly weighed opinions; no error |
| Whether ALJ considered Hepatitis C treatment effects post-2004 | ALJ ignored interferon-treatment effects on Jan 2005 onward | Record supported non-disability; no cumulative impact | Court reversed for that period; remanded for benefits |
| Whether RFC and credibility supported pre-2005 disability status | Pre-2005 impairments warranted disability | RFC supported by substantial evidence | Substantial evidence supported pre-2005 non-disability finding |
| Whether immediate benefit award was warranted for Jan 2005–May 2006 | Disability established during interferon treatment | Remand unnecessary; no decisive proof of entitlement | Remand for immediate benefits appropriate |
Key Cases Cited
- Lashley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 708 F.2d 1048 (6th Cir.1983) (substantial evidence standard applied to review for disability)
- Gibson v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 678 F.2d 653 (6th Cir.1982) (substantial evidence and deferential review)
- Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court 1971) (substantial evidence standard for SSA decisions)
- Landsaw v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 803 F.2d 211 (6th Cir.1986) (definition and application of substantial evidence)
