Douglas Evander St. Cyr v. State of Iowa
20-0628
| Iowa Ct. App. | Oct 20, 2021Background
- Two consolidated bench-trial matters: (1) traffic stop that produced methamphetamine and a driving-while-barred charge; (2) subsequent arrest after St. Cyr failed to appear, during which he rammed an undercover van, fled, abandoned a vehicle with contraband, and was later captured.
- Officer stopped St. Cyr for allegedly no registration plates at night; a Nebraska dealer in‑transit paper registration was taped to the rear window but not seen by the officer as he approached.
- While speaking to St. Cyr the officer observed suspected methamphetamine and discovered St. Cyr’s license was suspended; district court denied suppression and admitted the evidence.
- After St. Cyr missed his trial, a warrant issued; in attempting to effectuate the warrant, officers boxed an SUV believed to be St. Cyr’s; St. Cyr accelerated, rammed the unmarked van twice, fled, and later abandoned the SUV containing contraband.
- St. Cyr was convicted on multiple counts arising from both incidents (including possession of methamphetamine, driving while barred, failure to appear, assault with a dangerous weapon (lesser included), leaving the scene, possession of ammunition, driving while suspended).
- Appeal issues: (1) suppression of evidence from the traffic stop; (2) sufficiency of evidence for failure to appear; (3) sufficiency for assault with a dangerous weapon; (4) whether necessity or compulsion justified his conduct.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | St. Cyr's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lawfulness of traffic stop / motion to suppress | Officer had an objectively reasonable basis for the stop despite mistake about plates; discovery of contraband before any resolution justified continued detention | Officer was stopped in error because valid in‑transit sticker was displayed; officer unreasonably prolonged stop by not checking rear window first | Denial of suppression affirmed — officer’s mistake was objectively reasonable and contraband was observed before the mistake was discovered |
| Sufficiency — failure to appear | Notice was mailed to St. Cyr’s address, counsel was notified, and St. Cyr evaded arrest for months — supports willfulness | Lack of proof St. Cyr actually received notice; no proof of willful failure to appear | Conviction affirmed — substantial evidence supports willful failure to appear |
| Sufficiency — assault with a dangerous weapon | Repeatedly ramming the van (including while the driver was exiting) shows intent to cause injury or place officer in fear | Collisions were incidental to an attempt to flee, not intentional assaultive conduct | Conviction (lesser included offense) affirmed — substantial evidence of assaultive intent |
| Necessity / compulsion defenses | State: defendant created the danger, had alternatives, and no well‑grounded fear of imminent serious injury; statutory bar to compulsion when defendant intentionally/recklessly caused injury | St. Cyr: shot at / imminent danger justified ramming and fleeing; acted under compulsion/necessity | Defenses rejected — St. Cyr failed to generate fact questions; statutory compulsion exclusion applies because his conduct caused physical injury |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Lloyd, 701 N.W.2d 678 (Iowa 2005) (officer’s reasonable mistake of fact can justify a stop)
- State v. Coleman, 890 N.W.2d 284 (Iowa 2017) (stop must end once the reason for the stop is resolved)
- State v. Salcedo, 935 N.W.2d 572 (Iowa 2019) (investigatory stop must be tailored to the traffic infraction and related safety inquiries)
- State v. Warren, 955 N.W.2d 848 (Iowa 2021) (officers may extend a stop if reasonable suspicion of another crime develops)
- Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) (authority for seizure ends when tasks tied to traffic infraction are— or reasonably should have been—completed)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (two‑part Terry inquiry: justification at inception and scope reasonably related to circumstances)
- United States v. Mendoza, 691 F.3d 954 (8th Cir. 2012) (officer safety can justify certain investigatory approaches; factual comparison invoked in suppression analysis)
