Dorothy Elizabeth Cilwa v. Commonwealth of Virginia
0481154
| Va. Ct. App. | Nov 29, 2016Background
- Dorothy Cilwa pled guilty to two counts of grand larceny and was sentenced on January 28, 2010 to two concurrent 2-year terms, with 1 year and 1 month of each suspended for three years and two years of supervised probation after release.
- On January 27, 2012 the trial court found Cilwa in violation, imposed 90 days on each suspended sentence (concurrent), and on February 13, 2012 extended her probation for two years.
- The February 13, 2012 order did not expressly re-suspend the remaining unserved ten months or expressly extend the original three-year suspension period that began January 28, 2010.
- A bench warrant alleging a new probation violation issued June 9, 2014; Cilwa was served February 5, 2015 and a revocation hearing occurred February 20, 2015, at which the court found a violation and revoked probation.
- Cilwa appealed, arguing the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke/sentence because the three-year suspension period expired January 28, 2013, and also challenging service/notice; the Court of Appeals reversed for lack of jurisdiction.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether trial court had jurisdiction in Feb 2015 to revoke suspension and impose suspended sentence | Cilwa: the three-year suspension from Jan 28, 2010 expired Jan 28, 2013, so court had no jurisdiction to revoke in 2015 | Commonwealth: the Feb 13, 2012 order implicitly re-imposed and re-suspended remaining sentence and implicitly extended the suspension period when it extended probation | Held: Court lacked jurisdiction; suspension period expired Jan 28, 2013 and probation extension did not extend suspension period; reversal and dismissal |
| Whether appellant was properly noticed/served for alleged new criminal charges leading to revocation | Cilwa: service/notice insufficient under Code and due process | Commonwealth: service/notice was proper | Held: Court did not reach this assignment because case was resolved on lack of jurisdiction |
Key Cases Cited
- Harris v. Commonwealth, 274 Va. 409, 650 S.E.2d 89 (2007) (standard of review for statutory construction questions)
- Leitao v. Commonwealth, 39 Va. App. 435, 573 S.E.2d 317 (2002) (absence of explicit re-suspension may be treated as implicit re-suspension of unserved balance)
- Jacobs v. Commonwealth, 61 Va. App. 529, 738 S.E.2d 519 (2013) (related principles on implicit re-suspension and probation)
- Carbaugh v. Commonwealth, 19 Va. App. 119, 449 S.E.2d 264 (1994) (probation and suspension are distinct; expiration of suspension period ends court's power to revoke)
