History
  • No items yet
midpage
2024 ND 25
N.D.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Don’s Garden Center, Inc., owned by the McIlravys, entered into a purchase agreement with Kratz (The Garden District Inc.), but Kratz failed to make required payments.
  • The McIlravys filed two eviction actions in 2016 after Kratz’s nonpayment; one referenced service of a three-day eviction notice.
  • The district court issued a temporary restraining order and held funds from Kratz in trust; later, a third action resulted in damages and release of the trust funds to the McIlravys.
  • All eviction actions were eventually dismissed; Kratz did not appeal those dismissals or prior court orders at the time.
  • In 2023, Kratz filed a Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the orders in the eviction cases, alleging the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and seeking to void most past orders.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of Rule 60(b) Motion Motion not timely (implied by opposition) Timely under 60(b)(4) – voidness Motion is timely for void judgments
Subject Matter Jurisdiction of District Court District court had proper jurisdiction Court lacked jurisdiction District court had jurisdiction
Harmless Error in Order Adoption Any Rule 7.1(b)(1) violation was harmless Failure to allow response time Any violation was harmless error
Award of Attorney’s Fees Motion was frivolous and warranted fees Motion was not frivolous Award of attorney’s fees affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Kautzman v. Doll, 905 N.W.2d 744 (N.D. 2018) (appeal from denial of Rule 60(b) does not allow attack on underlying order)
  • Anderson v. Baker, 871 N.W.2d 830 (N.D. 2015) (limited scope on appeal for denial of reconsideration)
  • Olson Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Velva Parks, LLC, 997 N.W.2d 840 (N.D. 2023) (abuse of discretion standards for Rule 60(b))
  • Peterson v. Jasmanka ex rel. Clark, 842 N.W.2d 920 (N.D. 2014) (no time limit to move to vacate a void judgment)
  • Oden v. Minot Builders Supply, 955 N.W.2d 102 (N.D. 2021) (standards for Rule 60(b)(4) motions)
  • Bolinske v. Sandstrom, 978 N.W.2d 72 (N.D. 2022) (attorney’s fees for frivolous claims)
  • Sagebrush Res., LLC v. Peterson, 841 N.W.2d 705 (N.D. 2014) (attorney’s fees discretion standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Don's Garden Center v. The Garden District
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 8, 2024
Citations: 2024 ND 25; 2 N.W.3d 646; 20230270
Docket Number: 20230270
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
Log In
    Don's Garden Center v. The Garden District, 2024 ND 25