History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80187
D. Mass.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Dixons allege Wells Fargo promised to negotiate a loan modification if they followed steps and provided financial information, then foreclosed.
  • Dixons stopped paying and provided financial data as instructed, relying on Wells Fargo's promise.
  • Wells Fargo initiated foreclosure proceedings after the Dixons complied, prompting they sought injunctive relief, specific performance, and damages.
  • Massachusetts court previously issued a preliminary injunction halting foreclosure while dispute proceeded.
  • Court must decide whether promissory estoppel is plead adequately and whether HOLA preempts the state-law claim.
  • Dixons seek damages limited to reliance expenditures if promissory estoppel is established.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether promissory estoppel is adequately pleaded Dixons relied on Wells Fargo's promise to negotiate a modification. Promise was too indefinite to bind and not a true contract. Yes; complaint states promissory estoppel and reliance damages may be recoverable.
Whether promissory estoppel is preempted by HOLA Claim is a general common-law remedy for reliance, not a loan-terms or servicing regulation. Rest of §560.2 preempts state-law claims touching lending or servicing. Not preempted; promissory estoppel is a general common-law claim not designed to regulate lending.

Key Cases Cited

  • Loranger Constr. Corp. v. E.F. Hauserman Co., 376 Mass. 757 (Mass. 1978) (promissory estoppel standards adopted through Restatement § 90)
  • McLearn v. Hill, 276 Mass. 519 (Mass. 1931) (promissory estoppel seeks to enforce reliance in preliminary negotiations)
  • Greenstein v. Flatley, 19 Mass. App. Ct. 351 (Mass. App. Ct. 1985) (conduct constituting unfairness in negotiations may support estoppel)
  • Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co., 290 Mass. 210 (Mass. 1935) (the promise must be capable of enforcement where appropriate)
  • Cohoon v. Citizens Bank, 2000 WL 33170737 (Mass. Super. 2000) (promissory estoppel based on negotiations surrounding mortgage payoff)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Court Name: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Jul 22, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80187
Docket Number: Civil Action 11-10368-WGY
Court Abbreviation: D. Mass.