midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2019 Ohio 5366
Ohio Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Dix Road Property Management LLC entered a written lease with Jeremy Thomas and Brittany Adams on May 24, 2017 that included a 24% interest rate on any outstanding balances.
  • Thomas and Adams defaulted on rent, fees, utilities, and other charges; Dix Road sued for $2,670 on March 29, 2019 for breach of contract.
  • Defendants filed no responsive pleadings; Dix Road moved for default judgment and the trial court granted judgment on June 27, 2019.
  • The trial court awarded $2,670 plus postjudgment interest at 5% per year (and costs), rather than the 24% contractual rate requested by Dix Road.
  • Dix Road appealed, arguing the court was required to apply the written 24% rate to both prejudgment and postjudgment interest; the court reversed and remanded.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by awarding interest at 5% instead of the 24% contract rate Contractually agreed 24% rate governs both prejudgment and postjudgment interest No responsive pleadings; trial court applied statutory/default rate (5%) Reversed: the written 24% rate governs prejudgment and postjudgment interest; remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • Minster Farmers Coop Exchange Co. v. Meyer, 117 Ohio St.3d 459 (Ohio 2008) (parties may contract for a higher interest rate than the statutory rate)
  • Hobart Bros. Co. v. Welding Supply Serv., Inc., 21 Ohio App.3d 142 (10th Dist. 1985) (identifies prerequisites for a contract rate to displace the statutory rate)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dix Rd. Property Mgt., L.L.C. v. Thomas
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 30, 2019
Citations: 2019 Ohio 5366; CA2019-07-126
Docket Number: CA2019-07-126
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In