History
  • No items yet
midpage
Diversified Group Inc. v. United States
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20274
| Fed. Cir. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Diversified Group and its president James Haber sold two tax-avoidance strategies (OPS and FDIS) to ~192 clients between 1999–2001 and did not register them as tax shelters under pre-2004 § 6111.
  • IRS audited and issued Notices of Proposed Adjustment assessing § 6707 penalties totaling about $42.1 million for failure to register OPS and FDIS as tax shelters; penalties were computed as 1% of the aggregate invested amounts.
  • Diversified paid $15,500 (Dziedzic portion) and Haber paid $18,370 (Kotite portion), filed refund claims, which the IRS denied; they sued in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims seeking refunds.
  • The Claims Court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under the Flora full-payment rule, finding the § 6707 penalties were not divisible; Diversified appealed.
  • The Federal Circuit addressed (1) whether the Claims Court properly made a clerical correction to its opinion after a notice of appeal, and (2) whether the § 6707 penalties were divisible such that partial payments could satisfy Flora.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Claims Court could correct citation errors after a notice of appeal The Sept. 28 notice of appeal divested the Claims Court of jurisdiction, so it could not reissue judgment on Sept. 29 Rule 60(a) permits clerical corrections after appeal is filed until the appellate docketing; correction was clerical and did not affect substantive rights Court: Rule 60(a) allowed the clerical correction; appellate jurisdiction proper and review proceeds
Whether § 6707 penalties are divisible for purposes of Flora’s full-payment rule Penalties are divisible by each client implementation (192 instances); paying two client portions satisfied full-payment as to those assessments OPS and FDIS each constitute a single tax shelter; liability arises from one failure to register each shelter, so penalties are not divisible by client transactions Court: § 6707 liability arises from single failure to register a tax shelter (here, OPS and FDIS as each a single shelter); penalties are not divisible; full-payment rule not satisfied; dismissal affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145 (superseded on other grounds) (establishes full-payment rule for refund suits)
  • Korobkin v. United States, 988 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1993) (explains divisibility exception is narrow and applies when tax is aggregate of independent liabilities)
  • Rocovich v. United States, 933 F.2d 991 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (tax liability arising from a single event is not divisible)
  • Cencast Servs., L.P. v. United States, 729 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (discusses using a paid transaction as a test case when tax is divisible)
  • Univ. of Chi. v. United States, 547 F.3d 773 (7th Cir. 2008) (describes test-case approach and divisibility framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Diversified Group Inc. v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Nov 10, 2016
Citation: 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20274
Docket Number: 2016-1014
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.