History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 2482
Ohio
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Harold Lee Thompson, admitted 1975, previously publicly reprimanded in 1982 for withdrawing unearned client trust funds.
  • From Dec 2010–Apr 2012, Thompson used his client trust account for personal and office expenses, issued 77 checks to himself, and deposited personal funds into the trust account.
  • Between Dec 2010–Sep 2011, Thompson delayed withdrawing earned contingency fees from eight settlements, issuing numerous checks to himself over weeks/months and causing commingling and accounting failures that led to overdrafts.
  • A $100,000 settlement for client A.G. was deposited Jan 26, 2011; Thompson failed to timely remit $29,000 to A.G., and the trust account fell below that amount, resulting in at least $22,443.53 misappropriated.
  • Parties stipulated misconduct and proposed a sanction: two-year suspension with 18 months stayed conditioned on 18 months monitored probation and compliance with other requirements; the board and Supreme Court adopted that sanction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Use of client trust account for personal/office expenses Thompson used trust account as personal/operating account, paying rent, bills, issuing checks to himself, violating trust-account rules Thompson did not provide a contrary legal defense to the factual use; stipulated facts Violated Prof.Cond.R. 1.15(a) and 8.4(h); misconduct established
Failure to timely withdraw earned fees / accounting failures Thompson delayed withdrawing earned contingency fees, causing commingling, poor records, and overdrafts in violation of recordkeeping rules Thompson acknowledged delays and recordkeeping problems; mitigation evidence offered Violated Prof.Cond.R. 1.15(a), 1.15(a)(2), 1.15(a)(3), and 8.4(h); misconduct established
Misappropriation of client funds (A.G.) Thompson allowed trust balance to fall below client entitlement, misappropriating at least $22,443.53 Thompson later deposited $29,000 from his operating account and paid A.G.; stipulated restitution and remediation Violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(b),(c),(d), and 8.4(h); misappropriation found
Appropriate sanction (suspension length and conditions) Disciplinary counsel recommended 24-month suspension with 18 months stayed conditioned on 18 months monitored probation given prior discipline, pattern, and dishonesty Thompson offered mitigating factors: restitution, cooperation, upgraded accounting systems, OLAP participation Court imposed two-year suspension with last 18 months stayed on condition of 18-month monitored probation and no further misconduct; costs taxed to Thompson

Key Cases Cited

  • Columbus Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 69 Ohio St.2d 667 (1982) (prior public reprimand for withdrawing unearned trust funds)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 125 Ohio St.3d 46 (2010) (18-month suspension with portion stayed for commingling, overdrafts, misappropriation)
  • Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424 (2002) (factors to consider when imposing sanctions)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 115 Ohio St.3d 473 (2007) (weighing aggravating and mitigating factors under disciplinary procedure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Thompson
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 12, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 2482; 139 Ohio St. 3d 452; 12 N.E.3d 1203; 2013-1262
Docket Number: 2013-1262
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    Disciplinary Counsel v. Thompson, 2014 Ohio 2482